New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 5 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 5
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

An agile team discovers a new risk and identifies that its impact may be severe. What should an agile practitioner recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by My at Oct 20, 2023, 07:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Maurine
3 months ago
I agree with B, but we should also consider the severity of the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
3 months ago
Wait, are we really just going to keep going with the plan? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
3 months ago
A solid risk register update is crucial, so D is a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
4 months ago
Definitely not C! Ignoring the risk is a bad idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
4 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense. Balance is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
4 months ago
I recall something about maintaining velocity, but if the risk is severe, I wonder if option C is really the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
4 months ago
I think we had a practice question about risk management where updating the risk register was key. So, option D sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
4 months ago
I’m not sure, but I feel like adding a goal to the current iteration could be too much pressure. Maybe option A isn't the best?
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how important it is to balance risk and value in agile practices. I think option B might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
5 months ago
Wait, I'm confused. Should we just update the risk register and get a specialist involved? That seems like it might slow things down. Maybe option B is the safest bet to keep things moving while addressing the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. Should we really just continue with the current plan to maintain velocity, or is that too risky? I'm leaning towards option B to balance things out, but I'll have to think it through more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about how to handle a new severe risk in an agile context. I think the key is to balance risk reduction and value-adding activities, so I'd recommend option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The agile approach is to be responsive to changes, so adding a goal to the current iteration to mitigate the risk is the way to go. Option A is the clear choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Moving the work to the next stage seems like it could be a reasonable solution, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach. I'll need to re-read the question and think it through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
5 months ago
Okay, the key here seems to be understanding the different states of the storage pools and what that means for their management in HPE OneView. I think I've got a good handle on this, so I'll give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I thought testing was more of a later stage activity, not part of requirements gathering. But now that I think about it, validating the requirements through testing does seem relevant. I'll have to review my notes to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The question provides a lot of useful information about the current environments, so I should be able to identify the best steps to take.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
10 months ago
Option B is the way to go, unless of course, the risk involves a herd of angry llamas. Then all bets are off!
upvoted 0 times
Arminda
8 months ago
D) Update the risk register and seek direction from a risk specialist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
8 months ago
C: Unless those llamas are involved, then we might need a different plan!
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
9 months ago
B) Balance risk reduction and value adding activities in the next iteration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
9 months ago
B: Definitely, that seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
9 months ago
B) Balance risk reduction and value adding activities in the next iteration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
9 months ago
A: We should balance risk reduction and value adding activities in the next iteration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amina
10 months ago
A) Add a goal to the current iteration to fully mitigate or control the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eveline
10 months ago
Option C? Are you kidding me? Maintaining velocity at the expense of addressing a severe risk? That's just plain reckless.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option A. Dedicating an entire iteration to mitigating the risk seems like the most proactive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
10 months ago
Option D sounds like the prudent choice. Updating the risk register and seeking guidance from a risk specialist is the responsible thing to do.
upvoted 0 times
Jesus
9 months ago
D) Update the risk register and seek direction from a risk specialist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
10 months ago
A) Add a goal to the current iteration to fully mitigate or control the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
10 months ago
D) Update the risk register and seek direction from a risk specialist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
10 months ago
A) Add a goal to the current iteration to fully mitigate or control the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audra
10 months ago
I think updating the risk register and seeking direction from a risk specialist would be a good idea too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
11 months ago
I agree with Tracey, it's important to address the severe impact of the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
11 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go. Balancing risk reduction and value-adding activities is crucial in an agile environment.
upvoted 0 times
Afton
9 months ago
So, we should go with both options B and D to effectively manage the new risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
9 months ago
Yes, that's a good point. We need to make sure we have expert advice on how to handle the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
9 months ago
But shouldn't we also update the risk register and seek direction from a risk specialist?
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
10 months ago
I agree, balancing risk reduction and value-adding activities is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tracey
11 months ago
I think we should add a goal to mitigate the risk in the current iteration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel