PMI Exam PMI-ACP Topic 4 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam

Question #: 93
Topic #: 4

Midway through a sprint, a team member discovers that the product design fails to adhere to the organization's enterprise architecture standards. Since this required escalation to the architecture team for further analysis and resolution, the team was unable to deliver its sprint goal and the sprint was cancelled.

What should the team have done to avoid this?

AEscalated the issue to management

BEnsured the early engagement of key stakeholders

CProvided feedback to the architecture team to change the enterprise architecture standards

DRaised an exception for non-adherence to the enterprise architecture standards for this product

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Alecia at Nov 17, 2024, 03:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Elenora

19 days ago

Well, B) is the textbook answer, but I'm feeling a bit rebellious today. How about D)? Raise an exception and let the architecture team deal with it. What's the worst that could happen, another cancelled sprint?

upvoted 0 times

Tish

4 days ago

User 2: Tish is right, that's the safe bet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

4 days ago

I think B) is the safer option. It's important to engage key stakeholders early on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Whitney

8 days ago

User 1: B) Ensured the early engagement of key stakeholders.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nohemi

1 months ago

Haha, C) Providing feedback to change the standards? Good luck with that! The architecture team is like a brick wall, you're not getting through. B) is the safest bet, but where's the fun in that?

upvoted 0 times

Mitzie

10 days ago

User 2: True, sometimes it's better to play it safe and involve key stakeholders early on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeanna

22 days ago

User 1: Yeah, B) is the safe choice, but it's better than hitting a brick wall with C).

upvoted 0 times

...

Jill

1 months ago

I'd go with D) Raising an exception for non-adherence to the standards. Sometimes you have to bend the rules a bit to get things done. As long as the architecture team is on board, it's better than scrapping the whole sprint.

upvoted 0 times

Amie

6 days ago

User 2: That could have saved us from cancelling the sprint.

upvoted 0 times

...

Iola

18 days ago

User 1: We should have raised an exception for non-adherence to the standards.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chantell

1 months ago

B) Ensuring early engagement of key stakeholders is the way to go. That would have helped identify this issue upfront and avoid the sprint cancellation. Hindsight is 20/20, but better planning could have saved the day.

upvoted 0 times

...