New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 4 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 4
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

The product owner of an agile project is frustrated because the team is unable to deliver as many features as expected. The product owner asks the team to reduce test-automation levels, since the quality assurance team will test the product at project completion. The product owner expects that more features will be delivered in each iteration using this approach

What should the agile practitioner do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Mitsue at Oct 07, 2023, 11:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kaycee
3 months ago
I think we need to keep some level of automation for consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
3 months ago
Merging teams could really streamline the process!
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
4 months ago
Wait, how does cutting testing help deliver more features?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luke
4 months ago
Totally agree, quality should come first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
4 months ago
Reducing test automation sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that merging teams could help, but I’m not sure if that’s the best solution. Maybe we should focus on keeping quality high instead of just delivering more features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A because getting input from stakeholders seems crucial, but I worry it might slow down the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
4 months ago
I think we had a similar case study where the product owner wanted to cut corners on testing. I feel like option D might be the right approach, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
5 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of maintaining test automation during our agile training. Reducing it seems risky, but I'm not sure which option is best here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think the best approach is to involve the key stakeholders and the client to get their input. That way we can make sure we're taking the right approach for the project and the business needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
5 months ago
I've got a strategy for this one. I'd suggest working with the team to find a compromise, like doing a quality assurance iteration after every few sprints. That way we can still maintain some test automation without completely sacrificing feature delivery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. Reducing test automation seems risky, but I can understand the desire to deliver more features. I'll need to really analyze the options and think about the long-term implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if reducing test automation is the right call, but I can see the product owner's perspective of wanting to deliver more features. I'll need to think carefully about the pros and cons of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
5 months ago
I've seen this type of question before. I think the key is recognizing that the "Stop" profile will prevent the user from acquiring any additional profiles beyond the Network Administrator and "All" ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
5 months ago
This question seems a bit tricky. I'll need to make sure I don't just repeat the answer choices, but come up with my own reasons that are specific to the Oracle Solaris 11 and SPARC platform.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel