MENU
An agile leader notices that a team member is becoming very quiet and disengaged in meetings. What should the agile leader do to identify team members' personalities and motivators?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
NA
Nana
7 months ago
I feel like B might just distract from the real problem.
FR
France
7 months ago
A gives a clear framework. It’s proven effective.
LO
Lorrine
7 months ago
C could help, but it’s not the main issue.
CH
Chantay
7 months ago
B seems useful too, but not as direct.
JO
Jonell
7 months ago
I agree, A makes sense. Knowing motivators is key.
JO
Jospeh
7 months ago
BDUF seems outdated, why not just talk to the team directly?
SA
Sarah
8 months ago
Wait, hiring a SAFe coach? Is that really necessary?
TI
Tiffiny
8 months ago
Definitely agree with using DISC! It really helps understand people.
YU
Yuette
8 months ago
MoSCoW ratings? Not sure that really helps with engagement.
TI
Tina
9 months ago
A) DISC framework is a solid choice!
LU
Lucy
9 months ago
Employing BDUF? That's like trying to herd cats with a butterfly net.
TI
Tiara
9 months ago
A) The DISC framework is a great tool for understanding team dynamics and individual motivations.
VI
Vivienne
9 months ago
C) Hiring a SAFe coach is overkill for this situation. The agile leader should try to engage the team member directly first.
TI
Timothy
9 months ago
B) MoSCoW ratings are more for prioritizing requirements, not identifying team member personalities.
ED
Eden
9 months ago
A) The DISC framework can help the agile leader understand the team member's personality and motivators.
LA
Lawana
10 months ago
I feel like BDUF might be too rigid for an agile environment, but I can't recall how it relates to identifying motivators.
TA
Tarra
10 months ago
Hiring a SAFe coach sounds like a good idea, but I wonder if that would really address the root issue of disengagement.
NG
Nguyet
10 months ago
The DISC framework is a solid choice here. I might also consider having some one-on-one conversations with the team member to better understand what's going on and how I can support them. Building that personal connection could go a long way.
RO
Roosevelt
10 months ago
Definitely go with the DISC framework. That'll help you identify the team member's personality type and what motivates them. Then you can tailor your approach accordingly. Seems like the most direct way to address the issue.
NA
Nan
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. Hiring a SAFe coach or using BDUF don't seem like the right solutions for this problem. I think I'd focus on the DISC framework and MoSCoW ratings.
PA
Pamella
10 months ago
I think A is the best choice. DISC really helps understand personalities.
IL
Iluminada
11 months ago
I remember a practice question about engagement strategies, and I think MoSCoW ratings were more about prioritization than understanding personalities.
SA
Salina
11 months ago
I think using the DISC framework could really help understand team dynamics, but I'm not entirely sure how to implement it effectively.
BL
Blondell
11 months ago
The DISC framework sounds like a good approach. I might also try using MoSCoW ratings to keep people engaged and make sure their priorities are clear.
EM
Emily
12 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I think I'd start by trying to understand the team member's personality and motivators using the DISC framework. That could give me some insights to help re-engage them.
SA
Samira
6 months ago
A SAFe coach could be useful too, but it might be overkill.
KA
Kayleigh
6 months ago
Maybe, but I think knowing their personality first is key.
ME
Merilyn
6 months ago
I wonder if MoSCoW ratings could also help keep everyone involved.
PO
Portia
11 months ago
I agree, the DISC framework seems like a solid approach.
AL
Allene
11 months ago
Definitely! It helps in understanding different personalities.