Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 2 Question 98 Discussion

Posted by Thea on Mar 08, 2025 at 01:59 PM

Exhibit:

Based on the backlog metrics in the chart, what can explain the Jump in points at the end of iteration 4?

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
28 comments · newest first
ME
Merissa 10 months ago
I heard they added story points for improvements, which is interesting!
WI
William 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure they just didn't miscalculate earlier?
RO
Ronna 11 months ago
Totally agree, that jump is too big to ignore!
HA
Harrison 11 months ago
I think the product owner pushing for more output makes sense here.
LE
Leota 11 months ago
Looks like they reestimated some stories.
TO
Tonette 11 months ago
I wonder if the increase in output relates to the product owner's influence, like option D suggests. It seems plausible but I'm not entirely convinced.
JA
Jacquelyne 12 months ago
I feel like option C makes sense because underestimating stories is a common issue, but I can't recall if it specifically applies to this scenario.
CO
Cordelia 12 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this where the team added points after realizing some work could be improved. That might be option B?
GE
Gearldine 1 year ago
I remember discussing how re-estimating stories can lead to jumps in points, but I'm not sure if that's the main reason here.
UL
Ulysses 1 year ago
I think option C makes the most sense to me. The team realizing some stories were underestimated and re-estimating them would explain that sudden increase in points. But I'll review the other choices just to be thorough.
YU
Yuki 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this one. The backlog metrics don't seem to give a clear indication of what happened. I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully.
YV
Yvonne 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The jump in points at the end of iteration 4 is the key here. I'm leaning towards option C, but I'll double-check the other choices just to be sure.
KA
Katheryn 1 year ago
Hmm, the options all seem plausible. I'll need to really think through the implications of each one to determine the most likely explanation.
CA
Carma 1 year ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the backlog metrics and the options to figure out what could explain that jump in points.
PA
Pamella 2 years ago
Haha, I bet the team was like, 'Oops, looks like we messed up the estimations! Time to play 'Let's Make a Deal' with the backlog!'
JE
Jesusita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pamella
D) The team learned that the product owner needed to increase the output in the next release
JU
Justine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pamella
C) The team realized that some stories were underestimated relative to other stones and reestimated as needed
SY
Sylvia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Pamella
B) The team discovered that previously accepted work could be greatly improved and added story points associated with that work
PA
Pansy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Pamella
A) The team neglected to account for support and maintenance costs associated with other supported products
LE
Leota 2 years ago
I agree, Option C makes the most sense. It's common for teams to discover underestimated stories and need to adjust the points accordingly.
DE
Devora 2 years ago
Option C looks like the correct answer here. The team probably realized that some stories were underestimated and needed to re-estimate them.
LE
Leandro 2 years ago
↳ replying to Devora
It's important for teams to adjust estimates as they learn more about the work involved.
VE
Verlene 2 years ago
↳ replying to Devora
I think the team must have re-estimated the stories to reflect their actual complexity.
BU
Buddy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Devora
Agreed, option C seems to be the most logical explanation for the jump in points.
RO
Ronnie 2 years ago
That's a good point, Alberta. Improvements in work could definitely lead to added story points.
AL
Alberta 2 years ago
I believe the team might have discovered improvements in previously accepted work.
EL
Ellen 2 years ago
I agree with Ronnie, underestimation of stories could explain the increase in points.
RO
Ronnie 2 years ago
I think the jump in points could be due to underestimation of some stories.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel