Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 2 Question 89 Discussion

The risk profile of a project has increased beyond the upper threshold of tolerance. The product owner and project leader meet to discuss an approach for dealing with thisWhat should the team do next?
A) Add risk mitigation tasks to the backlog, then prioritize in current and upcoming sprints.
B) Add risk mitigation time to each requirement.
C) Apply the 80/20 rule, reserving 20 percent of each sprints capacity for risk mitigation.
D) Hold all risks until they become issues, then add issue resolution tasks to the product backlog

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 2 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 2
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

The risk profile of a project has increased beyond the upper threshold of tolerance. The product owner and project leader meet to discuss an approach for dealing with this

What should the team do next?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Kelvin at Sep 13, 2024, 09:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Arlen
6 months ago
Totally agree with A, let’s prioritize those risks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
6 months ago
B seems too rigid, we should adapt as we go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
7 months ago
Wait, D sounds risky... just waiting for issues?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
7 months ago
I think C makes more sense, balancing capacity is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
7 months ago
A is the best option, we need to tackle risks proactively!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
7 months ago
Adding risk mitigation time to each requirement sounds familiar, but I wonder if that would really help in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
8 months ago
I feel like just holding risks until they become issues is too reactive. We should definitely do something before they escalate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the 80/20 rule could be useful for balancing risk and regular tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
8 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of addressing risks proactively, so I think adding risk mitigation tasks to the backlog makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
8 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option C, the 80/20 rule. Reserving some capacity for risk mitigation could help us stay on top of things without overloading the backlog. But I'd need to think it through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
8 months ago
I think the key here is to be proactive in addressing the increased risk. Option A seems like the best approach - get those risk mitigation tasks planned and executed. Waiting until they become issues is just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. Should we really be adding more tasks to the backlog? Option C about reserving capacity for risk mitigation sounds interesting, but I'm not sure how that would work in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward risk management question. I'd go with option A - adding risk mitigation tasks to the backlog and prioritizing them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
2 years ago
I think applying the 80/20 rule could also be a good approach. It ensures that we allocate some capacity for risk mitigation in each sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
2 years ago
I agree with Gwenn. It's important to address the risks proactively to prevent them from becoming issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
2 years ago
Haha, D is like burying your head in the sand. Waiting for issues to arise and then dealing with them? No thanks, I'd rather be prepared.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. C looks interesting - reserving 20% of each sprint for risk mitigation could be a good safety net.
upvoted 0 times
Evelynn
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. C looks interesting - reserving 20% of each sprint for risk mitigation could be a good safety net.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
2 years ago
C) Apply the 80/20 rule, reserving 20 percent of each sprint's capacity for risk mitigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
2 years ago
B) Add risk mitigation time to each requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
2 years ago
C) Apply the 80/20 rule, reserving 20 percent of each sprints capacity for risk mitigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luann
2 years ago
B) Add risk mitigation time to each requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
2 years ago
A) Add risk mitigation tasks to the backlog, then prioritize in current and upcoming sprints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildegarde
2 years ago
A) Add risk mitigation tasks to the backlog, then prioritize in current and upcoming sprints.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gwenn
2 years ago
We should add risk mitigation tasks to the backlog and prioritize them in the sprints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
2 years ago
A is the way to go. Adding specific risk mitigation tasks to the backlog is the best approach to address the increased risk profile.
upvoted 0 times
Kanisha
2 years ago
B) I agree, it's important to address the risks proactively rather than waiting for them to become issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azzie
2 years ago
A) Add risk mitigation tasks to the backlog, then prioritize in current and upcoming sprints.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecil
2 years ago
I agree with Nohemi. Option A seems like the most proactive and systematic way to handle the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel