Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 2 Question 102 Discussion

Prior to a retrospective, discussions among team members indicate conflict. An agile practitioner wants to ensure an open and safe environment during the retrospective.What should the agile practitioner do?
A) Review established ground rules with the team
B) Ask team members specific questions to identify the cause
C) Encourage the team to continue working to maintain the iteration's schedule
D) Meet with the product owner and stakeholders to discuss the issue

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 2 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 2
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

Prior to a retrospective, discussions among team members indicate conflict. An agile practitioner wants to ensure an open and safe environment during the retrospective.

What should the agile practitioner do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Thaddeus at Jun 12, 2025, 05:40 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kimi
9 months ago
Option C is a bad idea, conflicts need addressing first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Audrie
9 months ago
Totally agree, option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
9 months ago
Really? I doubt just reviewing rules will fix the conflict.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
10 months ago
I think asking specific questions (B) could help too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
10 months ago
Ground rules are key for a safe space!
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
10 months ago
Meeting with the product owner sounds like a good idea, but I wonder if it would really help resolve the team's conflict directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
10 months ago
Encouraging the team to keep working seems risky; it could just make things worse. I feel like option C isn't the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
11 months ago
I remember a practice question where asking specific questions helped uncover issues, so option B might be a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
11 months ago
I think reviewing the ground rules is important, but I'm not sure if that's enough to address the conflict.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
11 months ago
Meeting with the product owner and stakeholders feels like it would just add more complexity. The retrospective should be a safe space for the team to work through their conflicts directly. I'm leaning towards B or A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
11 months ago
Encouraging the team to maintain the schedule seems like the wrong move here. The retrospective is the time to address any issues, even if it means falling behind a bit. I'd go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Should I focus on identifying the root cause of the conflict or just try to keep things on track? I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about creating a safe environment for a retrospective. I think reviewing the ground rules is the best approach to set the right tone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
1 year ago
D? Are you kidding me? The product owner and stakeholders don't need to be involved in this internal team issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 year ago
Ha! C is a joke, right? Maintaining the schedule is the last thing we should be worried about here.
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
1 year ago
B) Ask team members specific questions to identify the cause
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
1 year ago
A) Review established ground rules with the team
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anna
1 year ago
I think asking specific questions to identify the cause is also important to address the conflict.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
1 year ago
I'd go with B. Identifying the root cause is crucial to addressing the conflict effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Hester
1 year ago
C) Encourage the team to continue working to maintain the iteration's schedule
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
1 year ago
B) Ask team members specific questions to identify the cause
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
1 year ago
A) Review established ground rules with the team
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lewis
1 year ago
I agree with Anthony, setting ground rules can help create a safe environment for discussions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
1 year ago
Definitely A. Ground rules are key to ensure everyone feels comfortable and respected during the retrospective.
upvoted 0 times
Cordelia
1 year ago
A) Review established ground rules with the team
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
1 year ago
A) Review established ground rules with the team
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
1 year ago
B) Ask team members specific questions to identify the cause
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
1 year ago
A) Review established ground rules with the team
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anthony
1 year ago
I think the agile practitioner should review established ground rules with the team.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel