Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 2 Question 102 Discussion

Prior to a retrospective, discussions among team members indicate conflict. An agile practitioner wants to ensure an open and safe environment during the retrospective.What should the agile practitioner do?
A) Review established ground rules with the team
B) Ask team members specific questions to identify the cause
C) Encourage the team to continue working to maintain the iteration's schedule
D) Meet with the product owner and stakeholders to discuss the issue

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 2 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 2
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

Prior to a retrospective, discussions among team members indicate conflict. An agile practitioner wants to ensure an open and safe environment during the retrospective.

What should the agile practitioner do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Thaddeus at Jun 12, 2025, 05:40 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kimi
6 months ago
Option C is a bad idea, conflicts need addressing first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Audrie
6 months ago
Totally agree, option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
6 months ago
Really? I doubt just reviewing rules will fix the conflict.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
6 months ago
I think asking specific questions (B) could help too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
6 months ago
Ground rules are key for a safe space!
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
7 months ago
Meeting with the product owner sounds like a good idea, but I wonder if it would really help resolve the team's conflict directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
7 months ago
Encouraging the team to keep working seems risky; it could just make things worse. I feel like option C isn't the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
7 months ago
I remember a practice question where asking specific questions helped uncover issues, so option B might be a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
7 months ago
I think reviewing the ground rules is important, but I'm not sure if that's enough to address the conflict.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
8 months ago
Meeting with the product owner and stakeholders feels like it would just add more complexity. The retrospective should be a safe space for the team to work through their conflicts directly. I'm leaning towards B or A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
8 months ago
Encouraging the team to maintain the schedule seems like the wrong move here. The retrospective is the time to address any issues, even if it means falling behind a bit. I'd go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Should I focus on identifying the root cause of the conflict or just try to keep things on track? I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about creating a safe environment for a retrospective. I think reviewing the ground rules is the best approach to set the right tone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
11 months ago
D? Are you kidding me? The product owner and stakeholders don't need to be involved in this internal team issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
11 months ago
Ha! C is a joke, right? Maintaining the schedule is the last thing we should be worried about here.
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
10 months ago
B) Ask team members specific questions to identify the cause
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
10 months ago
A) Review established ground rules with the team
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anna
11 months ago
I think asking specific questions to identify the cause is also important to address the conflict.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
11 months ago
I'd go with B. Identifying the root cause is crucial to addressing the conflict effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Hester
10 months ago
C) Encourage the team to continue working to maintain the iteration's schedule
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
10 months ago
B) Ask team members specific questions to identify the cause
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
11 months ago
A) Review established ground rules with the team
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lewis
11 months ago
I agree with Anthony, setting ground rules can help create a safe environment for discussions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
12 months ago
Definitely A. Ground rules are key to ensure everyone feels comfortable and respected during the retrospective.
upvoted 0 times
Cordelia
11 months ago
A) Review established ground rules with the team
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
11 months ago
A) Review established ground rules with the team
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
11 months ago
B) Ask team members specific questions to identify the cause
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
11 months ago
A) Review established ground rules with the team
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anthony
12 months ago
I think the agile practitioner should review established ground rules with the team.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel