Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 2 Question 102 Discussion

Posted by Thaddeus on Jun 12, 2025 at 05:40 AM

Prior to a retrospective, discussions among team members indicate conflict. An agile practitioner wants to ensure an open and safe environment during the retrospective.

What should the agile practitioner do?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
KI
Kimi 11 months ago
Option C is a bad idea, conflicts need addressing first!
AU
Audrie 11 months ago
Totally agree, option A is the best choice.
BE
Belen 11 months ago
Really? I doubt just reviewing rules will fix the conflict.
MA
Margart 11 months ago
I think asking specific questions (B) could help too.
TA
Tarra 11 months ago
Ground rules are key for a safe space!
LA
Latosha 12 months ago
Meeting with the product owner sounds like a good idea, but I wonder if it would really help resolve the team's conflict directly.
DE
Della 12 months ago
Encouraging the team to keep working seems risky; it could just make things worse. I feel like option C isn't the right approach.
MA
Martina 1 year ago
I remember a practice question where asking specific questions helped uncover issues, so option B might be a good choice.
KR
Krystina 1 year ago
I think reviewing the ground rules is important, but I'm not sure if that's enough to address the conflict.
CE
Cecilia 1 year ago
Meeting with the product owner and stakeholders feels like it would just add more complexity. The retrospective should be a safe space for the team to work through their conflicts directly. I'm leaning towards B or A.
EL
Elinore 1 year ago
Encouraging the team to maintain the schedule seems like the wrong move here. The retrospective is the time to address any issues, even if it means falling behind a bit. I'd go with option A.
MA
Margot 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Should I focus on identifying the root cause of the conflict or just try to keep things on track? I'll have to think this through carefully.
EL
Eleni 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about creating a safe environment for a retrospective. I think reviewing the ground rules is the best approach to set the right tone.
BU
Buck 1 year ago
D? Are you kidding me? The product owner and stakeholders don't need to be involved in this internal team issue.
IZ
Izetta 1 year ago
Ha! C is a joke, right? Maintaining the schedule is the last thing we should be worried about here.
BA
Barbra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Izetta
B) Ask team members specific questions to identify the cause
SE
Sean 1 year ago
↳ replying to Izetta
A) Review established ground rules with the team
AN
Anna 1 year ago
I think asking specific questions to identify the cause is also important to address the conflict.
CH
Chaya 1 year ago
I'd go with B. Identifying the root cause is crucial to addressing the conflict effectively.
HE
Hester 1 year ago
↳ replying to Chaya
C) Encourage the team to continue working to maintain the iteration's schedule
HU
Hubert 1 year ago
↳ replying to Chaya
B) Ask team members specific questions to identify the cause
KY
Kyoko 1 year ago
↳ replying to Chaya
A) Review established ground rules with the team
LE
Lewis 1 year ago
I agree with Anthony, setting ground rules can help create a safe environment for discussions.
HU
Hubert 1 year ago
Definitely A. Ground rules are key to ensure everyone feels comfortable and respected during the retrospective.
CO
Cordelia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hubert
A) Review established ground rules with the team
MA
Marjory 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hubert
A) Review established ground rules with the team
FR
Franklyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hubert
B) Ask team members specific questions to identify the cause
LE
Lenna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hubert
A) Review established ground rules with the team
AN
Anthony 1 year ago
I think the agile practitioner should review established ground rules with the team.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel