Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI PgMP Exam - Topic 6 Question 80 Discussion

Several issues are identified on one component project in a program. During a meeting with that component's project manager, the program manager offers several suggested resolutions. Two weeks later, they meet again to review progress. The project manager had reviewed the issues and suggested resolutions, but delayed a decision. This two-week delay in taking action caused delays in the project schedule.What should the program manager do?
C) Emphasize that the project manager needs to address the issues and follow up at the next scheduled meeting.
A) Join project-level issue resolution meetings to accelerate the decision-making process.
B) Initiate discussions with the program governance board about assigning a more experienced project manager to the project.
D) Develop an immediate corrective action plan with the project manager and coach them on decision-making responsibilities. Section: Volume D Explanation

PMI PgMP Exam - Topic 6 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PgMP exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 6
[All PgMP Questions]

Several issues are identified on one component project in a program. During a meeting with that component's project manager, the program manager offers several suggested resolutions. Two weeks later, they meet again to review progress. The project manager had reviewed the issues and suggested resolutions, but delayed a decision. This two-week delay in taking action caused delays in the project schedule.

What should the program manager do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Mari at Jun 21, 2024, 10:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PgMP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kenneth
8 months ago
Not sure if just coaching is enough; they need to act fast!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
8 months ago
Option D could work too, but it might take longer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
8 months ago
Wait, why would they delay for two weeks? That's surprising.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
9 months ago
Agree, the project manager needs to step up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
9 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
9 months ago
I wonder if suggesting a more experienced project manager is too drastic. It seems like it could undermine the current project manager's authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patti
9 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think developing a corrective action plan sounds like a proactive approach. It might help the project manager feel more confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like joining the project-level meetings might help speed things up. It could show support and urgency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
10 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of timely decision-making in project management. I think emphasizing the need for the project manager to address the issues could be key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
10 months ago
I like the idea of option D - developing a corrective action plan and coaching the project manager. That seems like the most proactive and hands-on approach to resolving the issue. I'll make sure to explain my reasoning for selecting that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
10 months ago
Option C seems like the easiest choice - just emphasize that the project manager needs to address the issues. But I wonder if that's really addressing the root cause of the delay in decision-making. Maybe option D is the best way to get the project back on track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
10 months ago
I'm a bit unsure here. The delay in decision-making is the key issue, but I'm not sure if joining the project-level meetings (option A) or initiating discussions about a more experienced manager (option B) might also be good approaches. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
10 months ago
This seems like a straightforward project management issue. I'd focus on option D - developing a corrective action plan with the project manager and coaching them on decision-making responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
10 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The principles around interoperability, minimizing technical diversity, and facilitating scalability and enhancements seem like they'd be the most relevant based on the details provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
10 months ago
Reverse engineering the Staging tables in a Model and reviewing the data seems like a solid approach. That would give me a high-level view of the data and help me identify any issues before diving into the Mapping execution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
10 months ago
I'm a little confused on this one. Is it just about progress reporting, or do the senior managers have a more hands-on role in leading the recovery? I'll need to review the course materials again to make sure I understand the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
1 year ago
Option E: The program manager should just show up at the next meeting with a large 'Hurry Up' sign and a whistle. That should get the project manager moving!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
1 year ago
D is the way to go, in my opinion. The program manager needs to take a more active role and work closely with the project manager to get things back on track. They should probably also consider a career change for the project manager - maybe a job as a professional procrastinator?
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
1 year ago
I'm torn between C and D. The program manager could try coaching the project manager, but they may need to get more involved if the delays persist. Maybe they should develop a backup plan just in case.
upvoted 0 times
Vashti
1 year ago
D) Develop an immediate corrective action plan with the project manager and coach them on decision-making responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
1 year ago
C) Emphasize that the project manager needs to address the issues and follow up at the next scheduled meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
1 year ago
A) Join project-level issue resolution meetings to accelerate the decision-making process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dalene
1 year ago
C seems like the best option here. The project manager should be given the opportunity to take action, but the program manager needs to follow up and hold them accountable. Delaying decisions can have serious consequences.
upvoted 0 times
Beata
1 year ago
D) Develop an immediate corrective action plan with the project manager and coach them on decision-making responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
1 year ago
C) Emphasize that the project manager needs to address the issues and follow up at the next scheduled meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
1 year ago
A) Join project-level issue resolution meetings to accelerate the decision-making process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kyoko
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. The program manager needs to strike a balance between micromanaging and ensuring timely decisions. I'd go with option C - emphasize the need to address the issues without being too heavy-handed.
upvoted 0 times
Reena
1 year ago
User 3: Maybe we can coach them on decision-making to help speed things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, we don't want to micromanage but delays are causing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
1 year ago
User 1: Let's make sure the project manager knows they need to address the issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristel
1 year ago
But maybe they should also develop an immediate corrective action plan with the project manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
1 year ago
I agree with that. It would help accelerate the decision-making process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
1 year ago
I think the program manager should join project-level issue resolution meetings.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel