PMI PgMP Exam - Topic 6 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PgMP exam

Question #: 78
Topic #: 6

[All PgMP Questions]

An unforeseen geopolitical risk impacts a program to establish a company's operations abroad. Stakeholders now want to establish a risk response team to define a mitigation plan. Ultimately, what appeared to be a significant risk resulted in a negligible risk.

What should the program manager recommend to stakeholders for future, similar situations?

AAccept the risk

BSeek an expert opinion

CEstablish an on-call risk response team

DReview the risk severity matrix

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Arlie at May 20, 2024, 10:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PgMP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Pearline

3 months ago

Reviewing the risk severity matrix is a good idea too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Leontine

3 months ago

Seeking an expert opinion could help clarify things.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eve

3 months ago

But what if the risk is really negligible next time?

upvoted 0 times

...

Zoila

4 months ago

Totally agree, we need to be prepared for surprises!

upvoted 0 times

...

Iraida

4 months ago

I think establishing an on-call risk response team makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Temeka

4 months ago

Accepting the risk seems risky itself! I feel like we need a more proactive strategy, but I can't recall if that's what we practiced.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

4 months ago

Seeking an expert opinion sounds like a solid choice, especially since we can't always predict how risks will evolve.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

4 months ago

I think reviewing the risk severity matrix could help in assessing future risks better, but I wonder if it might take too long to implement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlette

5 months ago

I remember discussing the importance of having a risk response team, but I'm not sure if establishing one on-call is the best approach for every situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

5 months ago

This seems straightforward to me. The best option is to establish an on-call risk response team. That way, the company can quickly mobilize and respond to any unexpected geopolitical risks that arise in the future.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cortney

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not sure if I fully understand the scenario and what the stakeholders are looking for. I'll need to re-read it a few times to make sure I'm on the right track.

upvoted 0 times

...

Britt

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to recommend a solution that addresses the unexpected nature of the risk and ensures the company is prepared for similar situations in the future.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doyle

5 months ago

Hmm, this is a tough call. I'm leaning towards establishing an on-call risk response team, but I want to make sure I understand the full context before deciding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

5 months ago

This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the options and think through the implications of each recommendation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Twila

5 months ago

Okay, I've got a strategy here. I'll focus on the requirements of protecting against SQL injection and web-based attacks, while also minimizing operational overhead. I think one of the AWS security services might be the best fit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Renea

5 months ago

I think the answer is the Cost of Rework, but I'm not 100% sure. I'll review my notes quickly before submitting my answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

5 months ago

I remember this topic had some cost comparisons in the study materials, but I'm still unsure if "cost-effective" means it's cheaper than all alternatives.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geoffrey

9 months ago

Ah, the old 'unexpected geopolitical risk' trick. Guess someone's been watching too many spy movies. But seriously, an on-call risk response team is a smart move.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erin

9 months ago

I bet the stakeholders are feeling pretty sheepish after that whole ordeal. They should probably review the risk severity matrix to make sure they're not overreacting next time.

upvoted 0 times

Matilda

8 months ago

D) Review the risk severity matrix

upvoted 0 times

...

Graham

8 months ago

C) Establish an on-call risk response team

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

8 months ago

B) Seek an expert opinion

upvoted 0 times

...

Nelida

9 months ago

A) Accept the risk

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosendo

10 months ago

Accept the risk? Are you kidding me? That's like playing Russian roulette with the company's future. Gotta be proactive and set up that risk response team!

upvoted 0 times

Juan

8 months ago

C) Establish an on-call risk response team

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

8 months ago

B) Seek an expert opinion

upvoted 0 times

...

Bethanie

8 months ago

A) Accept the risk

upvoted 0 times

...

Jessenia

10 months ago

I'm not sure an expert opinion would be enough in this case. The risk turned out to be negligible, so I think reviewing the risk severity matrix is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Allene

9 months ago

C) Establish an on-call risk response team

upvoted 0 times

...

Edda

9 months ago

B) Seek an expert opinion

upvoted 0 times

...

Nguyet

10 months ago

A) Accept the risk

upvoted 0 times

...

Leila

10 months ago

Wow, that's a tricky one! I'd recommend establishing an on-call risk response team. That way, you're prepared to tackle any unexpected geopolitical risks head-on.

upvoted 0 times