Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI PgMP Exam - Topic 6 Question 72 Discussion

A program manager takes over a global program from another program manager. Upon arriving on-site, the program manager immediately sees that stakeholders are upset, because of a lack of updates and communications about the program.What should the program manager do first?
B) Review the program communications management plan and stakeholder register.
A) Review the program governance plan and communication log.
C) Review the stakeholder engagement plan and stakeholder matrix.
D) Notify the executive sponsor and update the program issue log.

PMI PgMP Exam - Topic 6 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PgMP exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 6
[All PgMP Questions]

A program manager takes over a global program from another program manager. Upon arriving on-site, the program manager immediately sees that stakeholders are upset, because of a lack of updates and communications about the program.

What should the program manager do first?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Linn at Mar 10, 2024, 09:53 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PgMP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shasta
6 months ago
Surprised no one mentioned the governance plan!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
6 months ago
C could be useful too, but B covers the basics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
7 months ago
Wait, why not just notify the execs first? Seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
7 months ago
Totally agree, B seems like the best choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
7 months ago
I think reviewing the communications management plan is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
7 months ago
I wonder if notifying the executive sponsor is too hasty. Shouldn't the program manager first assess the situation with the existing plans?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
8 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the stakeholder engagement plan could be important too. It might help in addressing the upset stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
8 months ago
I'm not sure, but I remember something about the stakeholder register being crucial for identifying who needs updates. Maybe that's the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
8 months ago
I think the program manager should probably start by reviewing the communication management plan. It seems like a good way to understand what went wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
8 months ago
This seems like a classic stakeholder management issue. Based on the information provided, I'd say option B is the way to go - reviewing the communications plan and stakeholder register to understand the current state and what needs to be improved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edison
8 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. There are a lot of moving parts to consider - governance, communications, stakeholders. I think I'd need to read through the choices a few times to decide which one is the best first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
8 months ago
Okay, this one's pretty clear to me. The first thing the program manager needs to do is get a handle on the communication and stakeholder management processes that are already in place. That means option A or B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. There are a few different options that seem reasonable. I might lean towards C and review the stakeholder engagement plan, but I'd want to double-check the other choices as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about managing stakeholder communication and engagement. I'd go with option B - reviewing the communications plan and stakeholder register to get a handle on the current situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
8 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is C - Perpetuity, since an annuity for an infinite period of time is essentially a perpetual stream of payments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
8 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully read through the policies and understand the order of evaluation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
8 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. If the credit period is longer than the operating cycle, the seller is effectively financing more than just the purchaser's inventory needs. I'm pretty confident that option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
8 months ago
Ugh, I'm totally lost on this question. I know Ethereum has something to do with blockchain, but I'm not sure about the specifics of how you access the nodes. I'll have to guess on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
2 years ago
That makes sense. It's important to have a clear understanding of how stakeholders are being engaged and communicated with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
2 years ago
I would also suggest reviewing the program communications management plan and stakeholder register to ensure alignment with the overall communication strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
2 years ago
Yes, I agree. Understanding the current state of communication is key to addressing the stakeholders' concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
2 years ago
I think the program manager should review the program governance plan and communication log first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
2 years ago
Wow, that sounds like a tough situation for the new program manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
2 years ago
Come on, you guys are overthinking this. The answer is clearly D - notify the exec sponsor and update the issue log. That's the fastest way to escalate and get some serious attention on this problem. Plus, the sponsor needs to know ASAP that this program is in trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
2 years ago
Ha, I bet the previous program manager was just sleeping on the job. Probably spending more time on the golf course than keeping stakeholders informed. But I digress, I think C is the way to go - review the stakeholder engagement plan and matrix. That'll give you the most insight into who's upset and why.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
2 years ago
I agree, B is the way to go. You need to understand the existing communication and stakeholder strategies before you can start fixing the issues. Jumping right into notifying the sponsor without that context could actually make things worse. Gotta do your homework first.
upvoted 0 times
Tricia
2 years ago
Correct, getting a clear picture first is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
2 years ago
Taking time to review the plans could prevent further misunderstandings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
2 years ago
You're right, proper planning and analysis are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
2 years ago
It's important to assess the situation before taking any actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
2 years ago
Absolutely, diving in without that knowledge is a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marla
2 years ago
In agreement with B. Understanding the current strategies is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
2 years ago
B) Review the program communications management plan and stakeholder register.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corinne
2 years ago
Wow, this question really hits the nail on the head. As a program manager, I know how crucial communication and stakeholder management are. I'd lean towards B - reviewing the communication plan and stakeholder register. That's the fastest way to get up to speed on the situation and address the stakeholders' concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel