Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI PgMP Exam - Topic 4 Question 108 Discussion

At the beginning of the second year of a five-year strategic cycle, the program management team attends a checkpoint session to review the state of the company's strategy. During the previous year, the company needed to comply with new government regulations that impacted this strategy.Based on this information, what should the program manager do?
D) Review resource capacity and capability, program priorities, and interdependencies, and create a change request to modify the program roadmap to ensure strategic alignment.
A) Update the program management, benefits management, and risk management plans, and modify priorities and interdependencies.
B) Meet with stakeholders, and modify the program roadmap to comply with the new regulations and ensure strategic alignment.
C) Obtain stakeholder approval to stop or postpone programs that fail to comply with the new regulations, and modify the program roadmap.

PMI PgMP Exam - Topic 4 Question 108 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PgMP exam
Question #: 108
Topic #: 4
[All PgMP Questions]

At the beginning of the second year of a five-year strategic cycle, the program management team attends a checkpoint session to review the state of the company's strategy. During the previous year, the company needed to comply with new government regulations that impacted this strategy.

Based on this information, what should the program manager do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Glenn at Nov 23, 2025, 09:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PgMP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Isadora
2 months ago
Option A is solid. Priorities need to be clear after changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonelle
2 months ago
I like option B too. Aligning with regulations is key for success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
2 months ago
I feel option D is comprehensive. It covers all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
2 months ago
Option C seems too drastic. We shouldn't stop programs without discussion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
2 months ago
C could lead to missed opportunities, not sure it's the best move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
2 months ago
Definitely agree with B, compliance is crucial for alignment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
3 months ago
Surprised that stopping programs isn't the first choice. Seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
3 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense. Stakeholder input is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
3 months ago
D) is the way to go. Gotta love those program roadmaps!
upvoted 0 times
...
James
4 months ago
Compliance with government regulations? Sounds like a real party!
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
4 months ago
A) seems like a good starting point, but I'd want to involve the stakeholders too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
4 months ago
C) is a bit too drastic. Stakeholders won't be pleased if we start shutting things down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
4 months ago
D) sounds like the most comprehensive approach. Covering all the bases is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glynda
4 months ago
B) is the way to go. Gotta keep those stakeholders happy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
4 months ago
Reviewing resource capacity sounds important, but I wonder if option D might take too long to implement compared to just modifying the roadmap directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
5 months ago
I feel like option C could be too drastic; stopping programs might not be necessary if we can adjust them instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think updating the risk management plans is crucial when regulations change, which makes option A appealing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'd probably start by meeting with stakeholders to understand the full impact of the regulations, then decide whether to go with option B or D depending on what we find.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C. If some programs can't comply with the new regulations, we may need to stop or postpone them to stay aligned with the overall strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. The key is ensuring strategic alignment after the regulatory changes. I think option D, reviewing resources and priorities and creating a change request, is the most comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of stakeholder engagement in similar practice questions, so option B seems like a strong choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
6 months ago
I agree, but option A also makes sense. Updating plans is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
6 months ago
I think option B is the best. Stakeholder input is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nancey
6 months ago
A is solid too, but it feels a bit too broad.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. Do we need to update all the management plans, or just focus on the program roadmap? I'm thinking option A or D might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
7 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd go with option B - meeting with stakeholders and modifying the program roadmap to comply with the new regulations.
upvoted 0 times
Jolene
25 days ago
I like B as well. Collaboration is essential for success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
1 month ago
True, but if we don’t meet with stakeholders first, we might miss something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
1 month ago
But what about option A? Updating all plans could be important too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
1 month ago
Agreed, aligning with regulations is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
6 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense. Stakeholder input is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel