Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI PgMP Exam - Topic 2 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PgMP exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 2
[All PgMP Questions]

You are the program manager of the NQA Program. In this program you're planning which contract types you'll allow into the program and which ones you will not. One contract type you won't accept is the cost plus percentage of cost contract. Which of the following is a valid reason you would not allow this contract type into your program?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Sylvie at Dec 09, 2024, 10:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PgMP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Leota
5 months ago
Vendors changing prices sounds sketchy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
5 months ago
A fixed price is definitely safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
5 months ago
Wait, are we sure they’re the most dangerous?
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
5 months ago
Totally agree, they’re risky for buyers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
6 months ago
Cost plus percentage contracts can lead to inflated costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about option B. I thought vendors couldn’t just change prices arbitrarily, but maybe that’s a concern with this contract type?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
6 months ago
I feel like option A is incorrect because it doesn't really explain why we wouldn't accept that contract type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
6 months ago
I think we practiced a question about contract types, and I recall that cost plus percentage contracts can be risky for the buyer. So, maybe option C is valid?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
6 months ago
I remember discussing how cost plus percentage contracts can lead to uncontrolled costs, but I'm not sure if that makes option C the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
6 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this. The reason a cost plus percentage of cost contract wouldn't be allowed is that it gives the vendor an incentive to increase costs, since their fee is based on a percentage of those costs. That's not aligned with the goals of the NQA program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
6 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think it through carefully and make sure I understand the pros and cons of different contract types before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The issue with cost plus percentage of cost contracts is that they allow the vendor to increase the price as they go, which gives them an incentive to drive up costs. That's probably why this program wouldn't accept that type of contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know cost plus percentage of cost contracts are risky for the buyer, but I'm not totally clear on the specific reasons why they wouldn't be allowed in this program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
7 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. The key is to identify the characteristics of a cost plus percentage of cost contract that make it undesirable for the NQA program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
12 months ago
Ah, the cost plus percentage of cost contract - the vendor's golden ticket to endless profits! Or the buyer's nightmare, depending on how you look at it.
upvoted 0 times
Nadine
10 months ago
C) The contract type allows is the most dangerous for the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
11 months ago
B) The contract type allows the vendor to change the price of the work he's completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
11 months ago
A) The contract type requires the vendor to provide a fee for the time invested and the materials used.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sheron
1 year ago
A) The contract type requires the vendor to provide a fee for the time invested and the materials used. That's not the reason to avoid this contract type. The issue is that the vendor's fee is a percentage of the overall cost, which incentivizes them to increase costs.
upvoted 0 times
Melynda
11 months ago
D) The contract type requires the vendor to provide a fixed price for the work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
11 months ago
C) The contract type allows is the most dangerous for the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
12 months ago
B) The contract type allows the vendor to change the price of the work he's completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Coral
1 year ago
D) The contract type requires the vendor to provide a fixed price for the work. Nope, that's not correct. The cost plus percentage of cost contract is the opposite of a fixed-price contract.
upvoted 0 times
Elroy
11 months ago
B) The contract type allows the vendor to change the price of the work he's completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colton
12 months ago
A) The contract type requires the vendor to provide a fee for the time invested and the materials used.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorian
1 year ago
C) The contract type allows is the most dangerous for the buyer. Absolutely right! This contract type puts the buyer at the most risk, as the vendor's fee is directly tied to the total cost of the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
1 year ago
B) The contract type allows the vendor to change the price of the work he's completed. This is a valid reason to not allow this contract type, as it can lead to cost overruns and a lack of cost control for the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
Tish
11 months ago
D) The contract type requires the vendor to provide a fixed price for the work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreen
11 months ago
C) The contract type allows is the most dangerous for the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
11 months ago
B) The contract type allows the vendor to change the price of the work he's completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
11 months ago
A) The contract type requires the vendor to provide a fee for the time invested and the materials used.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margarett
1 year ago
I see your point, but I think another valid reason is that this contract type requires the vendor to provide a fee for the time invested and materials used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
1 year ago
I agree with Dominga. It's risky for the buyer if the vendor can just increase the price whenever they want.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
1 year ago
I think the reason we wouldn't allow cost plus percentage of cost contract is because it allows the vendor to change the price of the work.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel