Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI PfMP Exam - Topic 4 Question 73 Discussion

ecause your company's Portfolio Review Board consists of the Directors of its five business units and is chaired by the CEO, the meetings tend to be contentious as there is limited funding available to authorize all the proposed programs and projects. Dissension also is the norm if resources are reallocated from one business unit to another. As a result, the CEO:
B) Decided to use an outside facilitator when meetings are held
A) Strives to use consensus to make decisions, but this approach rarely is effective
C) Uses multi-voting and makes the final decision
D) Often uses a Delphi approach

PMI PfMP Exam - Topic 4 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PfMP exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 4
[All PfMP Questions]

ecause your company's Portfolio Review Board consists of the Directors of its five business units and is chaired by the CEO, the meetings tend to be contentious as there is limited funding available to authorize all the proposed programs and projects. Dissension also is the norm if resources are reallocated from one business unit to another. As a result, the CEO:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Cherry at Sep 14, 2024, 02:31 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PfMP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Cyril
10 months ago
I doubt consensus (A) ever works in these scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
10 months ago
Multi-voting (C) could help streamline things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maricela
10 months ago
Really? A Delphi approach (D) seems too slow for urgent decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
10 months ago
I think using an outside facilitator (B) makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
11 months ago
Sounds like a tough situation for the CEO!
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
11 months ago
The Delphi approach seems interesting, but I can't recall how effective it is in resolving conflicts during meetings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
11 months ago
Multi-voting sounds familiar from practice questions, but I wonder if the CEO would really stick to that method in such a heated setting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
11 months ago
I think using an outside facilitator could help, but I’m not sure if it’s the best option in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
11 months ago
I remember studying about consensus decision-making, but it often leads to frustration in contentious environments like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
11 months ago
This question requires a good understanding of decision-making techniques. I'll draw on my project management knowledge to assess which approach would be most effective for the CEO in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options. Can the CEO really use a Delphi approach in this type of meeting? I'll need to research that method more to understand how it could work here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to focus on the CEO's role in managing the dissension and limited funding. I'll evaluate each choice to see which one best addresses those challenges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
11 months ago
Hmm, the CEO's approach is really important here. I think I need to analyze the pros and cons of each option to determine the best way to handle the contentious meetings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the different decision-making approaches mentioned and how they might apply to the given scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
2 years ago
This sounds like a classic case of 'too many cooks in the kitchen.' The CEO should just lock the business unit directors in a room until they reach a consensus. Maybe throw in some snacks to sweeten the deal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
2 years ago
Haha, the CEO must feel like a referee in a rugby match with all that dissension! I'd suggest they just start handing out yellow and red cards to keep things under control.
upvoted 0 times
Glen
2 years ago
Haha, the CEO must feel like a referee in a rugby match with all that dissension! I'd suggest they just start handing out yellow and red cards to keep things under control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
2 years ago
B) Decided to use an outside facilitator when meetings are held
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
2 years ago
A) Strives to use consensus to make decisions, but this approach rarely is effective
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruby
2 years ago
The Delphi approach seems like a good option here. It would allow the CEO to get input from all the business units while still maintaining control over the final decision.
upvoted 0 times
Ty
2 years ago
The Delphi approach could definitely help in this situation
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
2 years ago
C) Uses multi-voting and makes the final decision
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
2 years ago
A) Strives to use consensus to make decisions, but this approach rarely is effective
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Odette
2 years ago
An outside facilitator would be a great idea to help manage the contentious meetings. This would allow the CEO to focus on the discussions rather than trying to facilitate the process.
upvoted 0 times
Martina
2 years ago
D) Often uses a Delphi approach
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
2 years ago
An outside facilitator could definitely help keep things on track
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
2 years ago
C) Uses multi-voting and makes the final decision
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
2 years ago
B) Decided to use an outside facilitator when meetings are held
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aileen
2 years ago
I believe the CEO should consider using an outside facilitator to help with the meetings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
2 years ago
I agree with Glenn, but sometimes using multi-voting can be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
2 years ago
I think the CEO should strive to use consensus to make decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
2 years ago
The CEO should use multi-voting and make the final decision. This ensures that the decision-making process is fair and transparent, even if there is dissension among the business units.
upvoted 0 times
Hannah
2 years ago
True, having an impartial facilitator could help in resolving conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
2 years ago
In that case, maybe bringing in an outside facilitator could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
2 years ago
But what if the CEO still faces resistance from the business units?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
2 years ago
I agree, multi-voting could help in making a fair decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
2 years ago
C) Uses multi-voting and makes the final decision
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
2 years ago
A) Strives to use consensus to make decisions, but this approach rarely is effective
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel