MENU
Due to multiple occurrences of risk realization, the CEO has asked you to re-assess the portfolio risks once again. Up to what level in the organization do you go when you need to assess risks?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium PfMP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Risks are external and Internal and tend to span across all organizational levels. When a portfolio manager needs to assess risks, he/she will need to pass by all organizational levels
13 comments · newest first
EV
Eva
1 year ago
I’d say all levels for a comprehensive view.
DO
Dottie
1 year ago
Surprised that some think internal to the portfolio is sufficient!
LO
Lon
1 year ago
I agree, operational level is too narrow.
GA
Gayla
1 year ago
Definitely just the functional level is enough.
AN
Angelyn
1 year ago
I think you need to assess at all organizational levels.
WE
Wei
1 year ago
I’m uncertain about the right level. I feel like operational might be too narrow, but I can't recall if we covered all levels in depth.
ED
Edelmira
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question, and I believe the answer was to go internal to the portfolio. But this feels a bit different with the CEO's request.
CL
Claudio
1 year ago
I think we might need to assess risks at all organizational levels, especially since the CEO is involved. It seems like a comprehensive approach.
MO
Mona
1 year ago
I remember discussing how risks can vary at different levels, but I'm not sure if we should include all levels or just the top management.
EL
Elenore
1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. We have the BAC, the current project completion percentage, and the amount spent so far. I think I can use that information to calculate the ETC, but I'll need to be careful to account for the schedule variance.
EV
Evangelina
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards A for user story articulation too. It just seems to fit with how we develop initial requirements during planning.
MA
Marcelle
1 year ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. The organization needs a centralized solution to manage multiple Cisco FTD appliances, and it also needs to handle the migration from existing ASAs. Based on that, I think Cisco FMC is the best choice here.
EL
Elliott
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with JindoFS or E-MapReduce, so I'm a bit uncertain about this one. I'll try to reason it out based on the information provided, but I may have to guess on this one.