I'm not totally confident, but I think the input is seller proposals. That makes sense since Conduct Procurements is all about evaluating potential vendors.
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Let me re-read the question and think through the process of Conduct Procurements to determine the correct input.
I think the key here is that we need to protect the backend server, but not remove the header. That makes me think CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER might be the way to go, as it would modify the header without fully removing it. I'll double-check the documentation to be sure.
Raylene
8 months agoDolores
8 months agoGregoria
8 months agoTish
9 months agoLeonie
9 months agoTyisha
9 months agoClare
9 months agoArtie
9 months agoEttie
10 months agoYuriko
10 months agoAlverta
10 months agoCarin
10 months agoGlory
10 months agoLeonardo
10 months agoLashawnda
10 months agoJodi
10 months agoJulian
1 year agoLeota
1 year agoTheodora
1 year agoAlishia
1 year agoAlishia
1 year agoDallas
1 year agoDean
1 year agoMelvin
1 year agoTamar
1 year agoLou
1 year agoMoira
1 year agoMary
1 year agoMargart
1 year agoDorothea
1 year agoPearly
1 year agoGlendora
1 year agoBarney
1 year agoPearly
1 year agoBulah
1 year agoLaura
1 year agoDudley
1 year agoStephaine
1 year ago