New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI CAPM Exam - Topic 6 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's CAPM exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 6
[All CAPM Questions]

Using the three-point estimating technique, if the most likely duration is four months, the optimistic duration is two months, and the pessimistic duration is one year, how many months is the expected activity duration?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Mila
3 months ago
The expected duration comes out to around 5 months.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
3 months ago
Totally agree, that pessimistic estimate skews everything!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
3 months ago
Wait, how can the pessimistic be a whole year? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
4 months ago
So it's definitely not just 4 months!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
4 months ago
Expected duration is calculated using the formula (O + 4M + P) / 6.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
4 months ago
If I remember correctly, the expected duration is calculated as (Optimistic + 4*Most Likely + Pessimistic) / 6, but I'm not confident about the numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
4 months ago
I feel like the pessimistic duration really skews the average, but I can't recall the exact calculation method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think you average the optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely durations somehow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
5 months ago
I think the three-point estimating technique uses a formula, but I'm not entirely sure how to apply it here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
5 months ago
Wait, I think the formula is (Optimistic + 4 x Most Likely + Pessimistic) / 6. Let me double-check that and work it out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
5 months ago
The most likely duration is 4 months, the optimistic is 2 months, and the pessimistic is 12 months. I'm pretty sure the expected duration is the average of these three values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the formula for calculating the expected duration here. Let me think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
5 months ago
Okay, this looks like a classic three-point estimating problem. I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
5 months ago
I've got this! The missing factor is definitely the material properties of the components. That makes perfect sense in the context of vibration-induced fatigue. I'm feeling good about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure what the "except" part means, but I'll give it my best shot and try to eliminate the odd one out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by all the technical details in the images. I'll try to break it down step-by-step and see if I can figure out the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
9 months ago
I don't know, man. I'm just here for the free donuts. What's this about three-point estimating? Can I use that to estimate how many donuts I can eat in one sitting?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
10 months ago
This is easy! The expected duration is the average of the three estimates. So, (2 + 4 + 12) / 3 = 6 months. Wait, that's not one of the options. I guess I'll just go with C - five months.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
10 months ago
Hold on, isn't the three-point estimating technique supposed to give us a more accurate estimate? I'm going to have to do some calculations on this one. Hmm, I'll go with option D - twelve months. Better safe than sorry, right?
upvoted 0 times
Lilli
8 months ago
I agree with you, the expected duration is five months.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
8 months ago
I'm not sure about that, I believe it's four months.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
8 months ago
I think the expected duration is actually five months.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesusita
10 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. The most likely duration is four months, the optimistic duration is two months, and the pessimistic duration is one year. I'm going to go with option C - five months. That sounds about right.
upvoted 0 times
Jenelle
9 months ago
Yes, five months makes sense based on the three-point estimating technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
9 months ago
I agree, option C - five months seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
10 months ago
I think the expected duration is five months.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Natalie
10 months ago
This is a trick question! The expected duration is clearly not two months, four months, or even twelve months. Whoever came up with this needs to go back to school.
upvoted 0 times
Arminda
10 months ago
The expected duration is calculated as (optimistic + 4 * most likely + pessimistic) / 6
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
10 months ago
Five
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luisa
11 months ago
I agree with Linn, the expected duration should be four months based on the three-point estimating technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
11 months ago
I believe it is four months because that's the most likely duration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
11 months ago
I think the expected duration is five months.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel