Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PeopleCert MSP Foundation Exam - Topic 1 Question 33 Discussion

Which is MOST LIKELY to trigger premature closure of a programme?
C) The programme is no longer aligned with corporate strategy
A) The scope of one of the key projects has been changed
B) There is a change of senior responsible owner
D) The last tranche has been completed as per the programme plan

PeopleCert MSP Foundation Exam - Topic 1 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's MSP Foundation exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 1
[All MSP Foundation Questions]

Which is MOST LIKELY to trigger premature closure of a programme?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Olive at May 07, 2022, 07:49 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MSP Foundation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Cyril
10 months ago
I agree with C, alignment is key for success!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
10 months ago
A change in scope usually causes delays, not closure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
10 months ago
Wait, D means it’s finished, right? How is that a trigger?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
10 months ago
I think B could also lead to issues, new owners can change everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
10 months ago
Definitely C, if it’s not aligned, it’s done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
11 months ago
I recall that completing the last tranche doesn't necessarily mean the programme should close. So, I doubt option D is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where scope changes were mentioned, but I don't think that alone would trigger closure. It seems more like option C is the strongest candidate here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like a change in the senior responsible owner could lead to confusion and possibly premature closure. Maybe option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
11 months ago
I remember discussing how changes in corporate strategy can really impact a programme's viability. I think option C might be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is disabling the Use Calling Party's External Phone Number Mask on the route pattern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between CPU share and CPU cap. I'll need to review those concepts before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
11 months ago
The policy bindings having the wrong priorities is an interesting possibility. I'd review the policy configuration and make sure everything is set up correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel