I practiced a similar question where scope changes were mentioned, but I don't think that alone would trigger closure. It seems more like option C is the strongest candidate here.
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like a change in the senior responsible owner could lead to confusion and possibly premature closure. Maybe option B?
The policy bindings having the wrong priorities is an interesting possibility. I'd review the policy configuration and make sure everything is set up correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Cyril
4 months agoStefan
4 months agoFernanda
4 months agoNohemi
4 months agoRuth
4 months agoEvette
5 months agoJacklyn
5 months agoMichel
5 months agoVernell
5 months agoSamira
5 months agoSharita
5 months agoOnita
5 months ago