U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PeopleCert MSP Foundation Exam - Topic 1 Question 33 Discussion

Which is MOST LIKELY to trigger premature closure of a programme?
C) The programme is no longer aligned with corporate strategy
A) The scope of one of the key projects has been changed
B) There is a change of senior responsible owner
D) The last tranche has been completed as per the programme plan

PeopleCert MSP Foundation Exam - Topic 1 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's MSP Foundation exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 1
[All MSP Foundation Questions]

Which is MOST LIKELY to trigger premature closure of a programme?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Olive at May 07, 2022, 07:49 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MSP Foundation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Cyril
8 months ago
I agree with C, alignment is key for success!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
8 months ago
A change in scope usually causes delays, not closure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
8 months ago
Wait, D means it’s finished, right? How is that a trigger?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
8 months ago
I think B could also lead to issues, new owners can change everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
8 months ago
Definitely C, if it’s not aligned, it’s done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
9 months ago
I recall that completing the last tranche doesn't necessarily mean the programme should close. So, I doubt option D is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question where scope changes were mentioned, but I don't think that alone would trigger closure. It seems more like option C is the strongest candidate here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like a change in the senior responsible owner could lead to confusion and possibly premature closure. Maybe option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
9 months ago
I remember discussing how changes in corporate strategy can really impact a programme's viability. I think option C might be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is disabling the Use Calling Party's External Phone Number Mask on the route pattern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between CPU share and CPU cap. I'll need to review those concepts before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
9 months ago
The policy bindings having the wrong priorities is an interesting possibility. I'd review the policy configuration and make sure everything is set up correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel