Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PeopleCert ITIL 4 Practitioner Release Management Exam - Topic 3 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's ITIL 4 Practitioner Release Management exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 3
[All ITIL 4 Practitioner Release Management Questions]

[RM 6: How ITIL capability model can help the practice]

An organization has a dedicated release management team that is effective in managing releases, but this team has very poor coordination with the change enablement team. What capability level of release management does this indicate?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Willard at May 02, 2025, 11:07 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ITIL 4 Practitioner Release Management Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Velda
4 months ago
Really? I thought they’d be at least Level 2 with a dedicated team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
4 months ago
I think it's more like Level 2. They have a team, after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
4 months ago
Definitely Level 1. Poor coordination means they’re not mature yet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not Level 3? They might just need some training.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
5 months ago
Sounds like Level 1 to me. Coordination is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think it was about Level 2 as well, but I’m still debating if it could be Level 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
5 months ago
I think it might be Level 3, but I’m not entirely confident. Coordination issues seem to suggest they’re not fully integrated yet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
5 months ago
This feels like a Level 2 situation to me, where there's some capability but not enough coordination with other teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
6 months ago
I remember that Level 1 indicates initial processes, but I'm not sure if that's the right fit here since they have a dedicated team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
6 months ago
This is a tricky one. The question is testing our understanding of how the ITIL capability model applies to real-world scenarios. I'll need to carefully consider the relationship between the two teams and the level of integration to determine the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. If the release management team is effective but has poor coordination with the change enablement team, that indicates they are operating at a Level 2 capability, where the processes are defined but not fully integrated across the organization. I'll select that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. I know the ITIL capability model has different levels, but I'm not sure how to apply it to this specific scenario with the release management and change enablement teams. I'll need to review my notes to see if I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
6 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the ITIL capability model. I'll need to think about the relationship between release management and change enablement to determine the appropriate capability level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
10 months ago
This is an easy one. The lack of coordination between the teams indicates a Level 2 capability. It's like trying to run a marathon with one leg tied behind your back.
upvoted 0 times
Dottie
9 months ago
I disagree. Level 3 would mean there is a defined process for coordination, which doesn't seem to be the case here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
9 months ago
B) Level 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
9 months ago
That makes sense. Level 2 indicates some basic coordination but still room for improvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
9 months ago
A) Level 2
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcolm
10 months ago
You know, this question reminds me of the old joke about the IT manager who thought he could solve all his problems by throwing more software at them. Level 2, for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
10 months ago
I think the answer is B. Level 2. The organization is stuck in its ways, like a dog chasing its own tail. Time to get the change enablement team on the same page!
upvoted 0 times
Noe
10 months ago
B) Level 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
10 months ago
A) Level 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gladys
10 months ago
I see your point, Meghan. Level 3 could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
11 months ago
Definitely Level 2. The organization is managing releases effectively, but the lack of coordination with other teams is a clear sign of immaturity.
upvoted 0 times
Ernie
10 months ago
B) Level 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
10 months ago
I agree, the lack of coordination with other teams is a key indicator of Level 2 maturity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
10 months ago
A) Level 2
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Meghan
11 months ago
I disagree, I think it indicates Level 3 because there is some coordination but it's not effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
11 months ago
I agree with Eliz, Level 2 makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
11 months ago
The poor coordination with the change enablement team suggests a Level 2 capability, as the organization has not yet achieved the integration and collaboration required for higher levels.
upvoted 0 times
Katina
10 months ago
Level 3 would require better integration and collaboration between the release management and change enablement teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
10 months ago
B) Level 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
10 months ago
That makes sense, Level 2 indicates that there is room for improvement in coordination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
10 months ago
A) Level 2
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eliz
11 months ago
I think it indicates Level 2.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel