New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PeopleCert ITIL 4 Practitioner Release Management Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's ITIL 4 Practitioner Release Management exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All ITIL 4 Practitioner Release Management Questions]

[RM 4: How information and technology enable the practice]

During a value stream walk of the incident resolution value stream, an organization has realized that some incidents take longer to resolve because installation of overdue software updates is required. What should the organization do to improve the incident resolution times?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Viola
2 months ago
C seems a bit off, why not just handle updates during incidents?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
2 months ago
I think A makes more sense, integrate updates into the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
3 months ago
Wait, can we really enforce updates like that? Sounds tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
3 months ago
Totally agree with B, it’s about time we made updates a priority!
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
3 months ago
B is the way to go, updates should be mandatory!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
3 months ago
I recall that updates should be part of the overall service release strategy, but I wonder if that would actually help with incidents that are already in progress.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
4 months ago
I feel like including updates in request fulfillment could streamline things, but I’m not entirely convinced that’s the best approach for incidents specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
4 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this where enforcing updates was key to reducing resolution times. Option B seems like it could be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
4 months ago
I remember discussing how important it is to integrate updates into the incident resolution process, but I'm not sure if that means including them in the activities directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
4 months ago
Okay, this is a good one. I think the key is to look at where the updates are being handled in the process. Including them in the incident resolution activities (option A) or the request fulfillment activities (option C) seems like it would just add more steps and complexity. Option B or D, which focus on proactively managing the updates, seem like the better choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
4 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at here. The organization needs to be more proactive in managing software updates to prevent them from causing delays in incident resolution. I think option B is the way to go - ensuring the updates are enforced as part of ongoing operations and maintenance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few options presented, and I'm not entirely sure which one is the best approach. I'll need to carefully consider the pros and cons of each before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristen
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about improving incident resolution times. I think the key is to focus on ensuring the required software updates are handled proactively, rather than reactively during the incident resolution process.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel