Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PeopleCert ITIL-4-Practitioner-Deployment-Management Exam - Topic 2 Question 4 Discussion

Posted by Raelene on May 05, 2025 at 08:23 PM

[Engage with Stakeholders and Suppliers]

Which is NOT an example of how an organization should work with suppliers to improve its deployment management practice?

Suggested Answer: D

ITIL 4 encourages collaborative and flexible relationships with suppliers to enhance deployment management, focusing on value co-creation rather than rigid controls. Option D is not aligned with this approach, as overly detailed and rigorous procedures can hinder adaptability and innovation in supplier relationships.

Option A (Considering dependencies on third parties when analyzing service value streams which include deployment management): Correct practice, as understanding supplier dependencies ensures effective integration of deployment activities into value streams.

Option B (Carefully selecting suppliers of software tools for CI/CD pipeline): Correct, as choosing reliable suppliers for CI/CD tools is critical to building a robust deployment management practice.

Option C (Involving third parties in review and planning of the value streams that include deployment management): Correct, as supplier involvement in planning fosters collaboration and ensures alignment with deployment goals.

Option D (Developing and enforcing detailed and rigorous procedures for every interaction between suppliers and the organization): Incorrect, as this approach is overly prescriptive and contradicts ITIL 4's emphasis on flexible, value-focused supplier relationships. It risks stifling collaboration and innovation.


Get Premium ITIL-4-Practitioner-Deployment-Management Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
LI
Ling 10 months ago
A, B, and C all make sense for collaboration.
MA
Maile 10 months ago
Wait, are we really enforcing procedures for every interaction?
ST
Stevie 10 months ago
Totally agree, D seems too rigid!
CL
Clay 11 months ago
I disagree, having strict procedures can help avoid chaos!
CE
Cecily 11 months ago
I think D is the odd one out here.
FE
Felix 11 months ago
I recall something about value streams and dependencies, but I can't quite remember if that relates to deployment management. Maybe it's not D after all?
AL
Alyssa 11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like developing strict procedures might limit flexibility in working with suppliers. Could that be the answer?
JO
Jovita 11 months ago
I think we practiced a question about supplier selection for CI/CD tools, and that seemed important, so I’m leaning towards D as well.
VA
Van 12 months ago
I remember discussing how involving third parties can enhance collaboration, so maybe option D is the one that doesn't fit?
YU
Yuriko 12 months ago
Developing and enforcing detailed procedures for every interaction with suppliers - that's the one that doesn't seem like a good way to work with them to improve deployment management. The other options sound more collaborative and focused on value.
CA
Carlee 12 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to identify the option that is not an example of effective supplier engagement. I'll eliminate the ones that seem like good practices and select the one that stands out as not being a recommended approach.
AL
Alfred 1 year ago
Hmm, this one has me a bit stumped. I need to carefully read through the options and think about which one doesn't fit with the idea of collaborating with suppliers to improve deployment practices.
GA
Gail 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. I'll focus on identifying the option that is not an example of how an organization should work with suppliers to improve deployment management.
JO
Joesph 1 year ago
I see your point, Leatha, but I still think D is the correct answer because enforcing detailed procedures can hinder flexibility in working with suppliers.
TE
Teri 1 year ago
Haha, option D is like trying to herd cats with a rule book. Let's keep it simple and focus on the important stuff.
TA
Tamie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Teri
C) Involving third parties in review and planning of the value streams that include deployment management
JO
Jovita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Teri
B) Carefully selecting suppliers of software tools for CI/CD pipeline
DA
Dannie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Teri
A) Considering dependencies on third parties when analyzing service value streams which include deployment management
LE
Leatha 1 year ago
I disagree, I think it's C because involving third parties in review and planning seems like a good practice.
HE
Herminia 1 year ago
Wow, option D sounds like a bureaucratic nightmare. I'd rather work with suppliers, not against them.
HO
Hortencia 1 year ago
I think B is the best choice. Carefully selecting the right tools is crucial for an effective CI/CD pipeline.
FR
Freeman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hortencia
User 2: Definitely, it's important to carefully consider suppliers when improving deployment management practices.
AM
Ammie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hortencia
User 1: I agree, selecting the right tools is key for a successful CI/CD pipeline.
KI
Kimbery 1 year ago
I agree with Theola, D seems like the odd one out.
DO
Dominque 1 year ago
Option D seems too rigid and inefficient. We should focus on collaboration, not micromanagement.
AV
Avery 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dominque
C) Involving third parties in review and planning of the value streams that include deployment management
LA
Lavonna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dominque
B) Carefully selecting suppliers of software tools for CI/CD pipeline
TH
Theron 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dominque
A) Considering dependencies on third parties when analyzing service value streams which include deployment management
TH
Theola 1 year ago
I think the answer is D.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel