Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PeopleCert Exam ITIL-4-Foundation Topic 2 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's ITIL-4-Foundation exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 2
[All ITIL-4-Foundation Questions]

Which approach is CORRECT when applying the guiding principle 'keep it simple and practical'?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Don't start from scratch and build something new without considering what you already have. It's almost always better to improve what you currently have than to throw it all away and start again, although you must also be able to recognise when a complete replacement is, in fact, needed.

Not only is this approach less wasteful than starting from scratch -- because it preserves value that you already have -- but it also helps you to keep your people on board. They're much more likely to support the changes you need if their previous contributions have been appropriately valued.

Don't rely on metrics and reports to tell you what the current situation is. When you carry out an assessment you should observe what is happening for yourself, and just use the metrics to support your observations.

https://www.sysaid.com/blog/itil/the-7-guiding-principles-of-itil-4-practical-advice-to-help-you-make-decisions


Contribute your Thoughts:

Nikita
26 days ago
Personally, I'm a fan of the 'keep it simple, silly' approach. A all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Launa
2 days ago
User 2: Definitely, keeping it simple is key
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
3 days ago
User 1: I agree, A) Only add controls and metrics when they are needed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ma
1 months ago
D sounds too restrictive. What about controls that aren't strictly for compliance but still provide value? I'd go with A.
upvoted 0 times
Leandro
3 days ago
I see your point, but D does have its merits in ensuring compliance. It's a tough choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
4 days ago
I think B could work too, designing first and then removing what's not necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
23 days ago
I agree, A seems like the best option. Only adding what is needed makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lina
1 months ago
Hah, C is like the kitchen sink approach. Adding controls one by one until the whole system is bloated? No thanks!
upvoted 0 times
Lizbeth
21 hours ago
B) Design controls and metrics first, then remove those not adding value
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
9 days ago
A) Only add controls and metrics when they are needed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Huey
1 months ago
I disagree, I think B is the way to go. Design everything first, then trim the fat. That ensures you have a solid foundation to work from.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
1 months ago
Option A definitely aligns with the 'keep it simple and practical' principle. Why add extra controls and metrics if they're not needed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
2 months ago
I see both points, but I think D) Only add controls and metrics that are required for compliance makes the most sense in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe B) Design controls and metrics first, then remove those not adding value is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
2 months ago
I think the correct approach is A) Only add controls and metrics when they are needed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel