New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PeopleCert DevSecOps Exam - Topic 8 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's DevSecOps exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 8
[All DevSecOps Questions]

Which of the following BEST describes the goal of the security principle of accountability and non-repudiation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Cletus
3 months ago
D is just about passwords, doesn’t cover the whole concept.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
3 months ago
Wow, I didn’t realize non-repudiation was so crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
3 months ago
C is important, but it’s not about accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
4 months ago
Not so sure about that, B seems more accurate to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
4 months ago
A is definitely the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
4 months ago
I feel like option C is more about corporate reputation rather than accountability. It’s tricky, but I think we need to focus on the transaction aspect for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I believe it was about how accountability ensures that actions can be traced back to the responsible party. That sounds like A again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
4 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about trust being built through practices that validate data integrity. That might relate to option B, but it feels a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
5 months ago
I think the goal of accountability and non-repudiation is about ensuring that neither party can deny a transaction happened. So, I’m leaning towards option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
5 months ago
This is a good test of my understanding of security principles. I'll carefully read through the options and think about how each one relates to the goal of accountability and non-repudiation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of these options. I need to make sure I really understand the difference between accountability and non-repudiation before I can select the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kelvin
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The goal is to ensure that neither the sender nor the recipient can later deny a transaction, right? I'm leaning towards option A as the best description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, but I think I need to focus on the key concepts of accountability and non-repudiation to determine the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the principle of accountability and non-repudiation. I'm pretty confident I can identify the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on the information provided, storage1 seems like the best choice since it's a general-purpose storage account, which is typically recommended for boot diagnostics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I know DNS zone transfers can be a security risk, but I'm not totally familiar with the tools used to carry them out. I'll have to review my notes and try to remember the specific tools mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
2 years ago
Definitely, Howard. That's an important aspect of ensuring accountability and non-repudiation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
2 years ago
I think it also helps maintain corporate reputation by practicing good authentication procedures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
2 years ago
That makes sense, Juliann. It's important to ensure data transmissions are secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
2 years ago
I believe it is about enhancing trust between parties by validating data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
2 years ago
I agree with Marlon. It's about accountability and non-repudiation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
2 years ago
I think the goal is to ensure that neither the sender nor the recipient can deny a transaction took place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
2 years ago
I see your point, Garry. Non-repudiation does help in establishing trust and accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
2 years ago
That's true, but I still think non-repudiation is more crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
2 years ago
But what about option B? Enhancing trust between parties is important too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
2 years ago
I agree with Garry, option A seems like the best description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
2 years ago
I think the goal is to ensure neither the sender nor the recipient can deny the transaction.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel