Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PeopleCert Exam DevSecOps Topic 4 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's DevSecOps exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 4
[All DevSecOps Questions]

Which of the following BEST represents a key principle of a peer code review?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Leonor at Jan 28, 2025, 04:15 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DevSecOps Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Elke
3 months ago
I bet the person who wrote C is the same one who came up with 'alternative facts'. What a joke!
upvoted 0 times
Quentin
2 months ago
D) A peer code review enables management to take a hands-off approach to quality assurance
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
2 months ago
B) A peer code review allows an organization to avoid using a formal change process
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
2 months ago
A) A peer code review enables the organization to identify defects earlier in the process
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loreen
3 months ago
D is laughable. Peer reviews are all about active engagement, not a 'hands-off' approach. Management better be involved!
upvoted 0 times
Susy
2 months ago
I agree, management should definitely be involved in peer code reviews
upvoted 0 times
...
France
2 months ago
C) A peer code review enables deep worn and task speculation to improve the reliability of software
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
2 months ago
A) A peer code review enables the organization to identify defects earlier in the process
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leila
3 months ago
C is just nonsense. 'Deep worn and task speculation'? I think someone needs to go back to English class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
3 months ago
B? No way! Peer reviews are meant to complement the change process, not bypass it. That's a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
3 months ago
I also think A) is the best choice, it's important to identify issues sooner rather than later.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
3 months ago
I agree with Dick, catching defects early is crucial for quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
3 months ago
A is definitely the best answer here. Peer code reviews are all about catching issues early and improving the overall quality of the software.
upvoted 0 times
Thurman
2 months ago
Peer code reviews are a great way to ensure code quality and collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolann
2 months ago
It also allows for knowledge sharing and learning from each other.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
3 months ago
Definitely, it helps improve the overall quality of the software.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
3 months ago
I agree, catching defects early is crucial in peer code reviews.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dick
3 months ago
I think A) is the best option because it helps catch defects early.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel