Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PeopleCert DevSecOps Exam - Topic 4 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's DevSecOps exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 4
[All DevSecOps Questions]

Which of the following BEST represents a key principle of a peer code review?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Leonor at Jan 28, 2025, 04:15 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DevSecOps Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Janessa
6 months ago
Really? I thought peer reviews just added more work, not less!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
6 months ago
I think option B is misleading, we still need a change process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
6 months ago
Wait, how does option C even make sense?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
7 months ago
Totally agree, option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
7 months ago
A peer code review helps catch bugs early!
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
7 months ago
D seems off to me; I thought peer reviews were meant to enhance quality, not let management step back completely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
7 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think A was emphasized as a key benefit of peer reviews.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like B could be misleading since a formal change process is still important, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tatum
8 months ago
I remember that peer code reviews are really about catching defects early, so I think A might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
8 months ago
This is a good test of our understanding of peer code review principles. I think the key is to focus on the core purpose, which is to improve software quality through collaborative review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
8 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of some of these options. I want to make sure I'm not misinterpreting anything before I choose an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know peer code review is meant to identify defects early, so option A seems like the best fit. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem a bit tricky, and I want to make sure I understand the core purpose of peer code review before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the key principles of peer code review. I'm pretty confident I can identify the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
1 year ago
I bet the person who wrote C is the same one who came up with 'alternative facts'. What a joke!
upvoted 0 times
Quentin
1 year ago
D) A peer code review enables management to take a hands-off approach to quality assurance
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
1 year ago
B) A peer code review allows an organization to avoid using a formal change process
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
1 year ago
A) A peer code review enables the organization to identify defects earlier in the process
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loreen
1 year ago
D is laughable. Peer reviews are all about active engagement, not a 'hands-off' approach. Management better be involved!
upvoted 0 times
Susy
12 months ago
I agree, management should definitely be involved in peer code reviews
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 year ago
C) A peer code review enables deep worn and task speculation to improve the reliability of software
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
1 year ago
A) A peer code review enables the organization to identify defects earlier in the process
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leila
1 year ago
C is just nonsense. 'Deep worn and task speculation'? I think someone needs to go back to English class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
1 year ago
B? No way! Peer reviews are meant to complement the change process, not bypass it. That's a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
1 year ago
I also think A) is the best choice, it's important to identify issues sooner rather than later.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
1 year ago
I agree with Dick, catching defects early is crucial for quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
1 year ago
A is definitely the best answer here. Peer code reviews are all about catching issues early and improving the overall quality of the software.
upvoted 0 times
Thurman
1 year ago
Peer code reviews are a great way to ensure code quality and collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolann
1 year ago
It also allows for knowledge sharing and learning from each other.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
1 year ago
Definitely, it helps improve the overall quality of the software.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
1 year ago
I agree, catching defects early is crucial in peer code reviews.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dick
1 year ago
I think A) is the best option because it helps catch defects early.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel