Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PeopleCert DevOps SRE Exam - Topic 8 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's DevOps SRE exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 8
[All DevOps SRE Questions]

Which of the following BEST describes the most important rationale for NOT seeking an SLO of 100% availability?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Brittni at Sep 06, 2024, 09:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DevOps SRE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Reita
4 months ago
B is a real concern, setting such high targets can lead to burnout.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
5 months ago
Wait, is it really true that user satisfaction drops with just 2%?
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
5 months ago
C makes sense, high targets can stifle innovation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
5 months ago
I disagree, aiming for 100% pushes us to improve!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
5 months ago
A is spot on, 100% availability is just not feasible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
6 months ago
D seems off to me; I don’t recall user satisfaction being tied to such a small percentage. I think it’s more about the overall experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
6 months ago
I feel like C makes sense too, because if we set the bar too high, we might not have room to improve.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
6 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think B could also be valid since setting such high targets might lead to more failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
6 months ago
I remember discussing how aiming for 100% availability can be unrealistic given the complexity of systems. It feels like A might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
6 months ago
The key here is understanding the trade-offs involved. A 100% target may lead to failure, so a more reasonable goal is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
6 months ago
I think the answer is A - it's not realistic to expect 100% availability given the complexity of modern services. I'll explain that in my response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. I'll need to review the key points around SLOs and availability targets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
6 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the rationale for not seeking 100% availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
6 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not 100% sure how the different ratios are calculated, so I'll need to think it through step-by-step. My best guess is that the cost-to-income ratio would be the most directly impacted, but the other two could also be affected. I'll have to make an educated guess on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
11 months ago
A 100% availability target? Good luck with that! I'd like to see the engineer who can code a service that never, ever goes down. Maybe they can also make a car that never needs gas and a toaster that never burns the bread.
upvoted 0 times
Novella
10 months ago
A 100% availability target? Good luck with that! I'd like to see the engineer who can code a service that never, ever goes down. Maybe they can also make a car that never needs gas and a toaster that never burns the bread.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
10 months ago
C) There is no room for improvements if targets are so high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
10 months ago
B) The likely results is failure where such targets are defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
10 months ago
A) It is not realistic for the complexity and scale of services.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bette
11 months ago
Wait, user satisfaction is affected by 'a tow percent'? I'm not sure what that means, but it doesn't sound very convincing. I'll stick with A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
11 months ago
I like C. Leaving room for improvement is crucial. If you hit 100% right away, where do you go from there? You need some wiggle room to keep getting better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
11 months ago
Option B makes sense to me. If you set the bar so high, you're almost guaranteed to fail. That's not a great way to run a service. Realistic targets are key.
upvoted 0 times
Wayne
10 months ago
C) There is no room for improvements if targets are so high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
10 months ago
B) The likely results is failure where such targets are defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
10 months ago
A) It is not realistic for the complexity and scale of services.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katie
11 months ago
A 100% availability target is simply not realistic. As the question states, the complexity and scale of modern services make that an unachievable goal. I'll go with A on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Hermila
10 months ago
User 3: C) There is no room for improvements if targets are so high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
10 months ago
User 2: B) The likely results is failure where such targets are defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
10 months ago
User 1: A) It is not realistic for the complexity and scale of services.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delbert
1 year ago
B) The likely results is failure where such targets are defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
1 year ago
C) There is no room for improvements if targets are so high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
1 year ago
A) It is not realistic for the complexity and scale of services.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel