New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PeopleCert DevOps SRE Exam - Topic 8 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's DevOps SRE exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 8
[All DevOps SRE Questions]

Which of the following BEST describes the most important rationale for NOT seeking an SLO of 100% availability?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Brittni at Sep 06, 2024, 09:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DevOps SRE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Reita
3 months ago
B is a real concern, setting such high targets can lead to burnout.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
3 months ago
Wait, is it really true that user satisfaction drops with just 2%?
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
3 months ago
C makes sense, high targets can stifle innovation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
4 months ago
I disagree, aiming for 100% pushes us to improve!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
4 months ago
A is spot on, 100% availability is just not feasible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
4 months ago
D seems off to me; I don’t recall user satisfaction being tied to such a small percentage. I think it’s more about the overall experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
4 months ago
I feel like C makes sense too, because if we set the bar too high, we might not have room to improve.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
4 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think B could also be valid since setting such high targets might lead to more failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
5 months ago
I remember discussing how aiming for 100% availability can be unrealistic given the complexity of systems. It feels like A might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
5 months ago
The key here is understanding the trade-offs involved. A 100% target may lead to failure, so a more reasonable goal is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
5 months ago
I think the answer is A - it's not realistic to expect 100% availability given the complexity of modern services. I'll explain that in my response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. I'll need to review the key points around SLOs and availability targets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the rationale for not seeking 100% availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not 100% sure how the different ratios are calculated, so I'll need to think it through step-by-step. My best guess is that the cost-to-income ratio would be the most directly impacted, but the other two could also be affected. I'll have to make an educated guess on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
9 months ago
A 100% availability target? Good luck with that! I'd like to see the engineer who can code a service that never, ever goes down. Maybe they can also make a car that never needs gas and a toaster that never burns the bread.
upvoted 0 times
Novella
8 months ago
A 100% availability target? Good luck with that! I'd like to see the engineer who can code a service that never, ever goes down. Maybe they can also make a car that never needs gas and a toaster that never burns the bread.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
9 months ago
C) There is no room for improvements if targets are so high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
9 months ago
B) The likely results is failure where such targets are defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
9 months ago
A) It is not realistic for the complexity and scale of services.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bette
9 months ago
Wait, user satisfaction is affected by 'a tow percent'? I'm not sure what that means, but it doesn't sound very convincing. I'll stick with A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
10 months ago
I like C. Leaving room for improvement is crucial. If you hit 100% right away, where do you go from there? You need some wiggle room to keep getting better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
10 months ago
Option B makes sense to me. If you set the bar so high, you're almost guaranteed to fail. That's not a great way to run a service. Realistic targets are key.
upvoted 0 times
Wayne
8 months ago
C) There is no room for improvements if targets are so high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
8 months ago
B) The likely results is failure where such targets are defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
9 months ago
A) It is not realistic for the complexity and scale of services.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katie
10 months ago
A 100% availability target is simply not realistic. As the question states, the complexity and scale of modern services make that an unachievable goal. I'll go with A on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Hermila
8 months ago
User 3: C) There is no room for improvements if targets are so high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
8 months ago
User 2: B) The likely results is failure where such targets are defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
9 months ago
User 1: A) It is not realistic for the complexity and scale of services.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delbert
10 months ago
B) The likely results is failure where such targets are defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
11 months ago
C) There is no room for improvements if targets are so high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
11 months ago
A) It is not realistic for the complexity and scale of services.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel