New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APICS CPIM-8.0 Exam - Topic 5 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM-8.0 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 5
[All CPIM-8.0 Questions]

Labor 3 people

Work hours 10 hours per day

Days 4 days per week

Meetings with work area employees 1/2 hour per day

Work area efficiency 85%

Given the information above, what is the weekly theoretical capacity of this work area in hours?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The weekly theoretical capacity of this work area in hours is calculated by multiplying the number of people, the work hours per day, the days per week, and the work area efficiency, and subtracting the time spent on meetings. The formula is:

Capacity=(31040.85)(30.54)

Capacity=(102)(6)

Capacity=96

The closest answer to this value is 120, which is option D. Reference :=

CPIM Exam Content Manual, Module 5: Detailed Schedules, Section 5.1: Capacity Management, p. 18

Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management, Chapter 9: Capacity Planning and Management, Section 9.2: Capacity Planning Concepts, pp. 217-218


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Galen
2 months ago
Totally with you, Destiny! Makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Destiny
2 months ago
I think it’s 102 after accounting for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
3 months ago
10 hours x 4 days x 3 people = 120 hours, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
3 months ago
Wait, how do we get to 120? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
3 months ago
The total hours are 120 before efficiency!
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
3 months ago
I feel like I might be overthinking the efficiency part. Is it just a percentage of the total hours?
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
4 months ago
If we multiply the number of workers by the hours per day and days per week, that should give us a starting point, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chana
4 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to account for breaks, but here it seems like we just have meetings to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
4 months ago
I think we need to calculate the total hours first, but I'm not sure how to factor in the efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
4 months ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. Do we need to account for the 1/2 hour per day of meetings in each person's individual hours, or just subtract it from the total? And how exactly do we factor in the 85% work area efficiency? I want to make sure I have the right approach before I start calculating.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisandra
4 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. We have 3 people working 10 hours per day, 4 days per week. That's 120 hours total. Then we need to subtract the 2 hours per week for meetings, and then apply the 85% work area efficiency. I think I've got this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward enough. I think I'll start by calculating the total hours worked per week, then adjust for the meeting time and work area efficiency. Shouldn't be too tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. We have 3 people working 10 hours per day, 4 days per week. That's 120 total hours per week. But we need to account for the 1/2 hour per day of meetings, which is 2 hours per week. And the work area efficiency is 85%, so we need to adjust for that as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
6 months ago
I agree with Alida, because if you calculate the total hours based on the given information, it adds up to 114.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
6 months ago
The answer is definitely C) 114. The calculation is straightforward - 3 people x 10 hours per day x 4 days per week = 120 hours, and then adjusting for the 85% work area efficiency, you get 114 hours.
upvoted 0 times
Trina
5 months ago
No, I'm pretty sure it's C) 114.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
5 months ago
I think the answer is A) 97.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alida
6 months ago
I think the answer is C) 114.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel