I'm leaning towards B, False, since function points are supposed to provide a standardized way to measure software size and complexity, which should allow for comparisons across different systems.
I think the key here is the word "different kinds of systems." Function points might not be a good way to compare, say, a mobile app and an enterprise software system, since they have very different requirements and functionality.
Hmm, I'm not sure. The question seems to be implying that function points can't be used to compare different types of systems, but I'm not sure why that would be the case.
I'm pretty confident about this one. Function points are a standardized way to measure software size, so they should be comparable across different systems.
I'm going with 'False' on this one. Function points are specifically designed to provide a common metric for assessing software, regardless of the underlying technology. Comparing apples to oranges is kind of the whole point.
Ha, this question is a real head-scratcher! If function points can't be used to compare systems, what's the point of using them at all? Sounds like someone's trying to pull a fast one on us.
Hmm, this seems counterintuitive. Aren't function points used to measure software complexity and size? Why wouldn't they be applicable for comparing different systems?
Francine
3 months agoDesmond
3 months agoSheridan
3 months agoJames
4 months agoDestiny
4 months agoJanna
4 months agoTori
4 months agoViki
4 months agoChaya
5 months agoMarva
5 months agoMarg
5 months agoShonda
5 months agoTruman
5 months agoJohanna
5 months agoVerdell
10 months agoBrigette
9 months agoCecilia
9 months agoArmando
9 months agoCarman
10 months agoAnnamae
9 months agoShaquana
9 months agoPrecious
10 months agoNickolas
10 months agoMaxima
9 months agoNobuko
9 months agoJamal
9 months agoLonna
10 months agoSerina
10 months agoBulah
10 months agoDarrin
10 months agoEsteban
10 months agoVince
11 months agoEvelynn
11 months ago