To reduce the cost of removing defects, inspections should be emphasized, together with any other cost-effective techniques. The role of functional system testing should then be changed to one of gathering quality data on the programs.
True. Inspections are like a secret weapon in the battle against bugs - cheap, effective, and often overlooked. Who needs functional testing when you've got eagle-eyed inspectors?
I'm not sure about this one. Functional system testing is still an important part of the quality assurance process, even if the focus is shifted to gathering data.
I think the statement is true. Inspections are a cost-effective way to identify defects early in the development process, which can save a lot of money in the long run.
Nadine
2 months agoNana
26 days agoLourdes
27 days agoRose
1 months agoGerardo
1 months agoSharan
2 months agoDudley
3 months agoDorsey
1 months agoLashon
2 months agoJanna
2 months agoLura
3 months agoDonette
1 months agoKayleigh
1 months agoMicah
2 months agoMirta
3 months agoSalena
2 months agoDeane
2 months agoBlossom
3 months agoLuther
3 months agoYoko
3 months agoVince
3 months agoYoko
4 months ago