Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PeopleCert CSTE Exam - Topic 3 Question 108 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's CSTE exam
Question #: 108
Topic #: 3
[All CSTE Questions]

To reduce the cost of removing defects, inspections should be emphasized, together with any other cost-effective techniques. The role of functional system testing should then be changed to one of gathering quality data on the programs.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Leslie
6 months ago
Surprised to see this approach suggested!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
6 months ago
I think inspections alone won't cut it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
6 months ago
Wait, are we saying testing isn't important anymore?
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
7 months ago
Totally agree, quality data is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
7 months ago
Inspections really do save money on defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
7 months ago
I vaguely recall that inspections can help reduce costs, but I thought functional testing was still crucial for overall quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
7 months ago
I feel like the statement could be true, but I’m a bit confused about how functional testing fits into that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
7 months ago
I remember a practice question that emphasized the importance of both inspections and testing, so I’m leaning towards False.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
8 months ago
I think inspections are important, but I'm not sure if they should replace functional testing entirely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the phrasing of this question. I'll need to re-read it a few times and make sure I'm interpreting it correctly before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
8 months ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of software testing strategies and cost optimization. I'll review the key concepts and think through the implications before selecting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The question is asking whether the statement about emphasizing inspections and changing the role of system testing is true or false. I'll need to analyze the logic carefully to determine the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I want to make sure I understand the relationship between inspections, testing, and cost reduction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I'll focus on the key points - reducing cost, emphasizing inspections, and changing the role of system testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
1 year ago
Inspections? More like 'in-spections' of my work, am I right? But hey, if it saves the company a few bucks, I'm all for it!
upvoted 0 times
Nana
11 months ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
11 months ago
Inspections can definitely help catch mistakes early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
11 months ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerardo
12 months ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharan
1 year ago
True. Inspections are like a secret weapon in the battle against bugs - cheap, effective, and often overlooked. Who needs functional testing when you've got eagle-eyed inspectors?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
1 year ago
False. Functional system testing is essential for ensuring the program works as intended, and shouldn't be downplayed just to save money.
upvoted 0 times
Dorsey
11 months ago
False. Functional system testing is essential for ensuring the program works as intended, and shouldn't be downplayed just to save money.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
1 year ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
1 year ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lura
1 year ago
I'm not sure about this one. Functional system testing is still an important part of the quality assurance process, even if the focus is shifted to gathering data.
upvoted 0 times
Donette
12 months ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
12 months ago
I think it's true because inspections and other cost-effective techniques can help catch defects early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
1 year ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mirta
1 year ago
I think the statement is true. Inspections are a cost-effective way to identify defects early in the development process, which can save a lot of money in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
Salena
1 year ago
Absolutely, it's important to focus on cost-effective techniques like inspections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
1 year ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
1 year ago
I agree, inspections can help catch defects early on and save costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
1 year ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yoko
1 year ago
Why do you think it's false?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it is false.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
1 year ago
I think the statement is true.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel