Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pegasystems Exam PEGAPCSA87V1 Topic 10 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCSA87V1 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 10
[All PEGAPCSA87V1 Questions]

A business architect has developed a new process for a case type. To verify that the UI elements collect the expected results, you want to test the process and the fields. Which two configurations, when used together, allow you to record a set of interactions and save the test results to verify process functionality? (Choose Two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Herman at Sep 16, 2024, 11:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGAPCSA87V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Elliott
3 months ago
I'm just hoping the answer isn't 'All of the above' - that would be too easy, and where's the fun in that?
upvoted 0 times
Audra
1 months ago
D) Create a scenario test for the case type
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
2 months ago
A) Add explicit assertions on the UI elements
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
3 months ago
Ah, the classic dilemma: do I go for the comprehensive scenario test, or the more targeted validations? I guess I'll have to flip a coin on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Cyril
2 months ago
True, combining both options will provide a comprehensive test coverage for the process functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
2 months ago
I agree, but don't forget to also create a scenario test for the case type to cover all possible interactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
2 months ago
I think adding explicit assertions on the UI elements is crucial for verifying the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlette
3 months ago
Wait, a unit test for the case type? That sounds like a lot of work. I'm more of a lazy coder, so I'll go with option B - validations on the UI elements.
upvoted 0 times
Oretha
1 months ago
I think combining options A and B would be the best approach for thorough testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
1 months ago
That's a good point, option A can also be helpful in verifying the process functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
1 months ago
I prefer option A, adding explicit assertions on the UI elements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
3 months ago
Option B is a good choice for lazy coders like you.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
3 months ago
I agree, it's a quicker way to test the process without having to create a unit test for the case type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
3 months ago
Option B is a good choice. Validations on the UI elements can help verify the expected results.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Novella
3 months ago
Ooh, I like the idea of adding explicit assertions on the UI elements. That way I can really nail down the expected behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
3 months ago
Creating a scenario test for the case type could be useful too. It will provide a comprehensive verification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
3 months ago
I agree with Fallon. Adding validations on the UI elements will also help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
3 months ago
Hmm, I think option D is the way to go. Creating a scenario test will let me verify the entire process, not just individual UI elements.
upvoted 0 times
Isreal
2 months ago
Combining options A and D would be a good approach to thoroughly test the process and the fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
2 months ago
Creating a unit test for the case type can also be helpful in verifying the functionality of the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
2 months ago
I think adding explicit assertions on the UI elements is also important to ensure the expected results are being collected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
3 months ago
I agree, creating a scenario test will give a more comprehensive view of the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fallon
4 months ago
I think we should add explicit assertions on the UI elements.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel