New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems PEGAPCDC87V1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCDC87V1 exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 4
[All PEGAPCDC87V1 Questions]

A bank has been running traditional marketing campaigns for many years. One such campaign sends an offer email to qualified customers on day 1. On day 3, it sends a reminder email to customers who haven't responded to the first email. On day 7, it sends a second reminder to customers who haven't responded to the first two emails. If you were to re-implement this requirement using the always-on outbound customer engagement paradigm, how would you approach this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, D

Requirement Analysis: U+ Bank wants to display a specific credit card offer (Standard Card) to every customer who logs in to the bank website using Pega Customer Decision Hub.

Identify Mandatory Artifacts: To implement this requirement in Pega Customer Decision Hub, certain artifacts are necessary:

Business Structure: This defines the business hierarchy in Pega CDH, such as issues and groups. For this scenario, a relevant business issue and group must be defined (e.g., Credit Cards -> Standard Card).


Action and Associated Web Treatment: The specific credit card offer (Standard Card) must be created as an action, and it must have an associated web treatment to display on the bank's website.

Real-time Containers: These containers facilitate real-time interactions by displaying the appropriate offers to customers when they log in to the website.

Not Mandatory Artifacts:

Customer Contact Policies: These policies are used to limit the number of interactions with customers over a period. However, they are not mandatory for simply displaying an offer upon login.

Customer Engagement Policies: While important for determining eligibility, applicability, and suitability of offers, they are not specifically mandatory for the basic requirement of displaying an offer upon login.

Conclusion: The three mandatory artifacts to implement the requirement are a business structure, an action and the associated web treatment, and real-time containers.

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Avery
3 months ago
A primary schedule with reminders is a classic approach. Can't go wrong!
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
3 months ago
Option B is too complicated for this scenario. Just stick to the basics!
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
3 months ago
Wait, can AI really choose the best action? That’s surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
4 months ago
I disagree, D sounds more innovative with AI involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
4 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense. Simple and effective!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
4 months ago
I practiced a similar scenario before, and I think option A might be too rigid. The ad-hoc schedule seems like it could complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
4 months ago
I feel like option D could be a good choice since it uses AI to optimize engagement, but I’m a bit uncertain about how the AI would prioritize actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of segmenting audiences, so option B makes sense to me. But what if the segments overlap?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
5 months ago
I think option C sounds familiar; it reminds me of a practice question where we had to set up a flow with multiple actions. But I'm not entirely sure about the wait times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A. Seems like the simplest way to handle the primary offer email and then the reminders on an ad-hoc basis. Might be the most straightforward to implement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
5 months ago
Option B looks interesting, creating the 3 segments and schedules. That way I can target each group specifically. I'll have to think through the logistics of setting that up, but it could be a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the "always-on outbound customer engagement paradigm" part. I'll need to re-read that and make sure I understand the requirements before deciding on an approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward scenario, I'd probably go with option C and create an action with a flow that has the 3 email sends.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
10 months ago
Option D, all the way. Let the robots handle it - I'm just here to collect my paycheck and go home. Less work for me is always better!
upvoted 0 times
Alfreda
9 months ago
C) Create an action with a flow that contains 3 Send Email shapes, one for each email. Set appropriate wait times between the shapes
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
9 months ago
A) Configure a primary schedule for the original offer email and setup an ad-hoc or emergency schedule to send reminder emails
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
9 months ago
D) Configure the primary schedule to run daily and let the AI choose the best action from all the actions that a customer qualifies for based on engagement policies
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selma
10 months ago
I'd go with option C. It's the classic 'set it and forget it' approach. Plus, who doesn't love a good email drip campaign? It's like a digital Chinese water torture, but for customers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
10 months ago
Option A just sounds like a bandaid on the original campaign. Why not take the opportunity to really optimize the process with one of the other options?
upvoted 0 times
Alyssa
9 months ago
D) Configure the primary schedule to run daily and let the AI choose the best action from all the actions that a customer qualifies for based on engagement policies
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
9 months ago
C) Create an action with a flow that contains 3 Send Email shapes, one for each email. Set appropriate wait times between the shapes
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
9 months ago
B) Create three segments to identify the target audience for each of the three offer emails - day 1, day 3 and day 7. Setup three schedules per day targeting each of the three segments
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Olga
10 months ago
Option B is a bit more complex, but it could give you more control over the targeting and timing of the emails. I'd have to weigh the pros and cons of the additional complexity.
upvoted 0 times
Barney
9 months ago
True, Option D with AI choosing the best action could be efficient as well. It's all about weighing the pros and cons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
10 months ago
I agree, but Option C could also be a good approach with the Send Email shapes and wait times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
10 months ago
Option B does seem like it would give us more control over the targeting and timing of the emails.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Derrick
10 months ago
I like the idea of option D, letting the AI handle the customer engagement based on their policies. That way, the process is more dynamic and responsive to customer behavior.
upvoted 0 times
Andrew
8 months ago
I think it would save a lot of time and effort compared to manually sending out reminder emails on specific days.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
9 months ago
It definitely adds a level of personalization to the customer experience, which is important in marketing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
9 months ago
I agree, it would be interesting to see how the AI chooses the best action based on customer engagement policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
10 months ago
Option D sounds like a great idea. Letting the AI handle it would make the process more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lindsey
10 months ago
Option C seems the most straightforward and logical approach to me. Setting up a flow with the three emails and appropriate wait times seems like the easiest way to implement this always-on engagement scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Eric
10 months ago
Yeah, setting up a flow with the emails and wait times makes it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
10 months ago
I agree, option C does seem like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Val
10 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think having separate segments for each email ensures a more personalized approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more efficient as it leverages AI to choose the best action for each customer based on engagement policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
11 months ago
I think option B is the best approach because it allows for targeted messaging to different segments at different times.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel