New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems PEGAPCDC87V1 Exam - Topic 3 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCDC87V1 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 3
[All PEGAPCDC87V1 Questions]

U+ Bank uses a Next-Best-Action decision strategy to automatically approve credit card limit changes requested by customers. A scorecard model determines the customer credit score. The automatic approval of credit card limits are processed based on the following criteria set by the bank:

The bank wants to change the threshold value for the USD 2000 credit limit from ''<175'' to ''<200''.

As a Strategy Designer, how do you implement this change?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To implement the change in the threshold value for the USD 2000 credit limit from ''<175'' to ''<200'', as a Strategy Designer, you should change the cutoff value in the results tab of the scorecard decision component. This adjustment ensures that the decision logic used to automatically approve credit card limits reflects the new threshold, thereby updating the conditions under which customers qualify for the specified credit limit.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Erasmo
2 months ago
B seems more accurate for mapping the score.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
2 months ago
Definitely agree with A, makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
3 months ago
C is a solid choice too, but A feels more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
3 months ago
Wait, can we really just change the cutoff like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
3 months ago
I think option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
3 months ago
I feel like mapping the score value might not be the best approach here. It seems like a direct cutoff change is more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether we should change the strategy or the scorecard directly. Both options seem plausible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
4 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to adjust a scorecard threshold. I think option D sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
4 months ago
I think we need to change the condition in the strategy, but I'm not sure if it's the right syntax.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
4 months ago
I'm a little confused by the different components mentioned here - the strategy, the scorecard model, the results tab. I'll need to carefully read through the details to make sure I understand how they all fit together before deciding on the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
4 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to update the cutoff value in the scorecard model, which is option D. That way, the credit limit approval criteria will be updated across the entire system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions a "decision strategy" and a "scorecard model," so I'm not sure if just changing the condition is enough. Maybe I should look into the other options as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
5 months ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I think I'd go with option A and just change the condition in the strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
5 months ago
But changing the cutoff value in the scorecard model seems more logical to me, so I think D) is the correct answer
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) Change the cutoff value in the results tab of the scorecard decision component
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
6 months ago
I think the correct answer is A) Change in the strategy the condition from ''.pxSegment <=175'' to ''.pxSegment <=200''
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel