Pegasystems Exam PEGACPSSA23V1 Topic 7 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSSA23V1 exam

Question #: 22
Topic #: 7

Consider the following requirement: Car dealers cannot modify orders in the Fulfillment stage. Which security solution do you use to satisfy the requirement?

AAccess of Role to Object

BAccess When

CAccess group

DAccess Deny

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

Access of Role to Object (ARO) is used to define the level of access that a role has to instances of a class. In this case, an ARO can be created for the car dealers' role to restrict modify access to orders in the Fulfillment stage. Reference: Pega Platform Help - Security.

by Kiley at Sep 19, 2024, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGACPSSA23V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Melodie

10 months ago

I'm feeling the 'Access group' option. We can create a group specifically for the dealers and control their access that way. Sounds like a nice, tidy solution to me.

upvoted 0 times

Annabelle

9 months ago

Access group is a great solution to ensure that car dealers cannot modify orders in the Fulfillment stage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephania

9 months ago

Access group would definitely help in maintaining security by limiting the dealers' access to modify orders.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audria

9 months ago

I think using 'Access group' is a good choice to restrict modifications by car dealers in the Fulfillment stage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arminda

9 months ago

I agree, creating a group for the dealers seems like the best way to control their access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carrol

10 months ago

But wouldn't using Access Deny be more specific in restricting modifications in the Fulfillment stage?

upvoted 0 times

...

Melita

10 months ago

Haha, I bet the car dealers are just itching to modify those orders. We should just block them completely and be done with it. Option D all the way, baby!

upvoted 0 times

Ines

9 months ago

I see your point, but I think completely denying access with Option D is the safest bet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

10 months ago

But wouldn't it be better to limit their access based on their role? Option A might be a more secure solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larue

10 months ago

I agree, we should definitely block them from modifying orders. Option D is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilbert

10 months ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Access of Role to Object.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dell

10 months ago

Hold up, what if we use 'Access of Role to Object'? That way we can assign different roles to the dealers and restrict their access based on those roles. Seems like a more robust solution to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felix

10 months ago

Hmm, I'm not so sure. Option D, 'Access Deny', seems more straightforward. If we just deny the dealers the ability to modify orders during the Fulfillment stage, that solves the problem, right? Simple and effective!

upvoted 0 times

Santos

9 months ago

Hyun: Yeah, you're right. 'Access Deny' does seem more straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyun

9 months ago

I agree with Remona, 'Access Deny' seems like the simplest solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Remona

9 months ago

But what about option A, 'Access of Role to Object'? Wouldn't that also work?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosalyn

9 months ago

I think option D, 'Access Deny', is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carrol

10 months ago

I think the answer is D) Access Deny.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dell

10 months ago

I think option B, 'Access When', is the way to go. It sounds like it would allow us to control when the dealers can modify orders, which is exactly what the requirement needs.

upvoted 0 times

Yen

10 months ago

I think option B is the most appropriate solution to ensure that car dealers cannot modify orders in the Fulfillment stage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominque

10 months ago

I agree, option B seems like the best choice for this requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...