New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems PEGACPSSA23V1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSSA23V1 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 1
[All PEGACPSSA23V1 Questions]

You are integrating two Pega Web Mashups into a client's mortgage loan financing page. What do you configure to successfully embed both mashups?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

When integrating multiple Pega Web Mashups into a single page, it is necessary to identify unique names for each mashup to ensure that they are embedded and function independently without conflict on the client's page. Reference: Pega Platform Help - Pega Web Mashup.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Darrin
3 months ago
Simultaneous loading could cause issues, better stick to unique names!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
3 months ago
Identical URLs won't work, that's a no-go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
3 months ago
Wait, can you really run them on the same thread? Sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
4 months ago
Totally agree, option C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
4 months ago
You need unique names for each mashup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards loading both mashups simultaneously, but I wonder if that would actually work without issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
4 months ago
Running both mashups on the same thread sounds risky; I don't think that's a good idea based on what we studied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about embedding mashups, and I feel like defining identical URLs could cause conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
5 months ago
I think we might need to identify unique names for each mashup, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
5 months ago
Okay, let me make sure I understand. We need to make sure the mashups have different names so they don't conflict, but we also can't just load them simultaneously. I think I need to re-read the question to make sure I'm on the right track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
5 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at. Unique names makes sense - that way the system can differentiate between the two mashups and load them properly. I feel pretty confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
5 months ago
I think the key here is to identify unique names for each mashup. That should help ensure they don't conflict with each other when embedded on the page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know we need to configure something to get the mashups to work together, but I'm not sure if unique names is the right approach. Let me think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know a high hurdle rate is used to be more selective, but I'm not sure about the specific reasons why management would do that. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
5 months ago
I distinctly recall a question that emphasized that banks don't hold cryptocurrency, so I'm leaning away from C. Definitely not a bank account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Is it asking about a specific issue that H-VPLS doesn't address? I'm not totally sure, but I'll give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
2 years ago
I think loading both mashups simultaneously is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
2 years ago
I believe running the mashups on the same thread would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
2 years ago
I agree with Germaine, unique names will help distinguish between the mashups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
2 years ago
I think we should define unique names for each mashup.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel