New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pegasystems PEGACPSA88V1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSA88V1 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 4
[All PEGACPSA88V1 Questions]

You are configuring an accident claim case with two child cases for an automobile insurance company, as shown in the following figure:

The business requirement changes to allow the parent case to continue independently of the child case processes How do you configure the Wait step for this requirement?

Available Choices (select all choices that are correct

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

by Ettie at Jan 27, 2025, 08:43 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGACPSA88V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Hortencia
3 months ago
Definitely leaning towards D, it makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
3 months ago
B and C are too restrictive for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
3 months ago
Wait, can the parent really move on without the child cases?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
4 months ago
I think A could work too, but D is more flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
4 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D too, but I wonder if there are any implications for the workflow if we allow that. It seems like the safest choice based on what we studied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the parent case had to wait for all child cases. This feels different, so I think option B could be a good fit if it allows some flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option A could also work since it mentions resolving one child case. But it doesn't seem to fully meet the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how the parent case should be able to move forward without waiting for the child cases. I think option D might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
5 months ago
This looks straightforward enough. I think options A and D are the correct choices to allow the parent case to continue independently. I'll review my reasoning one more time before submitting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different statuses mentioned in the options. I'll need to make sure I understand how they relate to the business requirement before selecting my answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
5 months ago
Okay, the key is that the parent case needs to continue independently of the child cases. I'm leaning towards option D, but I'll make sure to consider all the choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
5 months ago
Hmm, the question is asking about configuring a Wait step, so I'll need to focus on that. I think options A and D might be the right choices, but I'll double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the business requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
10 months ago
I'm going with C and D. The parent case should be able to continue when the child cases reach auditor approval, but also when the users decide they're done waiting and just want to move on.
upvoted 0 times
Bettina
8 months ago
Yes, C and D cover both scenarios for the business requirement change. It's important to configure the Wait step correctly for the case processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
8 months ago
I agree, C and D make sense for configuring the Wait step. It allows flexibility for the parent case to continue independently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
9 months ago
I think C and D are the correct choices. The parent case should continue when the child cases reach auditor approval and when users want to move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devorah
10 months ago
Haha, the way this question is worded, it's like they're trying to trick us! But I'm going with D, because who wants to be held hostage by their own child cases, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards B and D. The parent case should be able to continue when the child cases reach the payment pending review status, but it should also be able to continue regardless of the child case status.
upvoted 0 times
Reed
10 months ago
I agree. It's important for the parent case to be able to continue independently of the child case processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
10 months ago
I think B and D are the correct choices. The parent case should continue when the child cases reach payment pending review status.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roxane
11 months ago
I think we should also configure the step so that users can continue with the parent case process regardless of child case status. It gives more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is D. The parent case should be able to continue regardless of the child case status, as per the business requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Bernardine
9 months ago
User 4: Yes, users should be able to continue with the parent case process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
9 months ago
User 3: So, we should configure the step to allow that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
9 months ago
User 2: I agree, the parent case should continue independently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
10 months ago
User 1: I think the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clay
11 months ago
I agree with Stevie. It makes sense to wait for auditor approval before continuing with the parent case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
11 months ago
I think we should configure the step to continue the parent case when the child cases reach auditor approval.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel