Pegasystems Exam PEGACPSA88V1 Topic 2 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSA88V1 exam

Question #: 44
Topic #: 2

A business architect has developed a new process for a case type. To verify that the Ul elements collect the expected results, you want to test the process and the fields. Which two configurations, when used together, allow you to record a set of interactions and save the test results to verify process functionality? (Choose two.)

Available Choices (select all choices that are correct!

ACreate a scenario test for the case type

BCreate a unit test for the case type

CAdd explicit assertions on the Ul elements.

DAdd explicit assertions on the Scenario testing landing page

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, C

To record a set of interactions and save the test results to verify process functionality, you can create a scenario test for the case type and add explicit assertions on the UI elements. A scenario test is a test that simulates how users interact with an application to complete a task or goal. An explicit assertion is a test condition that verifies whether an expected value matches an actual value in the application. Reference: https://community.pega.com/knowledgebase/articles/testing-applications/86/creating-scenario-tests

by Renea at Mar 23, 2025, 05:30 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGACPSA88V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dominga

3 months ago

I'm with the rest of you, A and C are the way to go. Although, can we talk about how bizarre 'Scenario testing landing page' is as an option? What is this, a game of Snakes and Ladders?

upvoted 0 times

Karl

2 months ago

I know, 'Scenario testing landing page' does sound a bit strange.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

2 months ago

Yeah, A and C seem like the best choices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rueben

2 months ago

C) Add explicit assertions on the Ul elements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tanja

2 months ago

A) Create a scenario test for the case type

upvoted 0 times

...

Adell

2 months ago

I agree, A and C are the best choices here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

2 months ago

Yeah, A and C make sense for testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larue

2 months ago

C) Add explicit assertions on the Ul elements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salena

3 months ago

A) Create a scenario test for the case type

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

3 months ago

Interesting question. I reckon A and C are the way to go. Gotta love those explicit assertions on the UI, really get to the heart of things, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

4 months ago

I'm not sure about C, but I think B is also a good option for testing the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawanda

4 months ago

Haha, unit tests for a case type? That's like trying to test a car by taking it apart. Definitely A and C are the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shantay

4 months ago

I agree with Renea, creating a scenario test and adding explicit assertions on the Ul elements make sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mertie

4 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about D. Asserting on the Scenario testing landing page doesn't seem relevant to testing the process and fields. I'd go with A and C.

upvoted 0 times

Fidelia

2 months ago

I would choose A and C as well. They seem like the most relevant options for verifying the functionality.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helene

3 months ago

I think A and B would be a good combination for testing the process and fields.

upvoted 0 times

...

Madonna

3 months ago

I agree, D does seem out of place. A and C make more sense for testing the process and fields.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

4 months ago

I think the correct answers are A and C. By creating a scenario test for the case type, we can record a set of interactions and verify the process functionality. And adding explicit assertions on the UI elements will help us ensure that the expected results are collected.

upvoted 0 times