Pegasystems PEGACPSA88V1 Exam - Topic 2 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSA88V1 exam

Question #: 44
Topic #: 2

A business architect has developed a new process for a case type. To verify that the Ul elements collect the expected results, you want to test the process and the fields. Which two configurations, when used together, allow you to record a set of interactions and save the test results to verify process functionality? (Choose two.)

Available Choices (select all choices that are correct!

ACreate a scenario test for the case type

BCreate a unit test for the case type

CAdd explicit assertions on the Ul elements.

DAdd explicit assertions on the Scenario testing landing page

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, C

To record a set of interactions and save the test results to verify process functionality, you can create a scenario test for the case type and add explicit assertions on the UI elements. A scenario test is a test that simulates how users interact with an application to complete a task or goal. An explicit assertion is a test condition that verifies whether an expected value matches an actual value in the application. Reference: https://community.pega.com/knowledgebase/articles/testing-applications/86/creating-scenario-tests

by Renea at Mar 23, 2025, 05:30 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGACPSA88V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Audria

2 months ago

D seems off, not sure why it's even an option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Douglass

2 months ago

I think B should be included too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlene

3 months ago

Totally agree with A and C!

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristen

3 months ago

Wait, can you really save test results with just those?

upvoted 0 times

...

Derick

3 months ago

A and C are the right choices!

upvoted 0 times

...

Anjelica

3 months ago

I think I saw a question similar to this where we had to choose between unit tests and scenario tests, but I can't remember the details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arletta

4 months ago

I feel like adding explicit assertions on the UI elements is important, but I’m not clear if it’s the best choice alongside the scenario test.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tuyet

4 months ago

I remember practicing with unit tests, but I can't recall if they specifically save test results like scenario tests do.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lennie

4 months ago

I think creating a scenario test for the case type is definitely one of the options, but I'm not sure about the second one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denise

4 months ago

Creating a scenario test and adding explicit assertions on the UI elements seems like the best approach to thoroughly test the new process. I'll make sure to select those two options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolanda

4 months ago

I think the scenario test and adding assertions on the UI elements are the way to go. That should let me capture the user interactions and validate the process is working as expected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lina

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between scenario tests and unit tests. I'll need to review those concepts before deciding which options to choose.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ty

5 months ago

This question is asking about testing the UI elements of a new process, so I think the key is to focus on configurations that allow recording interactions and verifying the process functionality.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominga

11 months ago

I'm with the rest of you, A and C are the way to go. Although, can we talk about how bizarre 'Scenario testing landing page' is as an option? What is this, a game of Snakes and Ladders?

upvoted 0 times

Karl

9 months ago

I know, 'Scenario testing landing page' does sound a bit strange.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

9 months ago

Yeah, A and C seem like the best choices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rueben

9 months ago

C) Add explicit assertions on the Ul elements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tanja

9 months ago

A) Create a scenario test for the case type

upvoted 0 times

...

Adell

9 months ago

I agree, A and C are the best choices here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

9 months ago

Yeah, A and C make sense for testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larue

10 months ago

C) Add explicit assertions on the Ul elements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salena

10 months ago

A) Create a scenario test for the case type

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

11 months ago

Interesting question. I reckon A and C are the way to go. Gotta love those explicit assertions on the UI, really get to the heart of things, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

11 months ago

I'm not sure about C, but I think B is also a good option for testing the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawanda

11 months ago

Haha, unit tests for a case type? That's like trying to test a car by taking it apart. Definitely A and C are the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shantay

11 months ago

I agree with Renea, creating a scenario test and adding explicit assertions on the Ul elements make sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mertie

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about D. Asserting on the Scenario testing landing page doesn't seem relevant to testing the process and fields. I'd go with A and C.

upvoted 0 times

Fidelia

10 months ago

I would choose A and C as well. They seem like the most relevant options for verifying the functionality.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helene

10 months ago

I think A and B would be a good combination for testing the process and fields.

upvoted 0 times

...

Madonna

10 months ago

I agree, D does seem out of place. A and C make more sense for testing the process and fields.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

11 months ago

I think the correct answers are A and C. By creating a scenario test for the case type, we can record a set of interactions and verify the process functionality. And adding explicit assertions on the UI elements will help us ensure that the expected results are collected.

upvoted 0 times