New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems PEGACPSA88V1 Exam - Topic 6 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSA88V1 exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 6
[All PEGACPSA88V1 Questions]

In the Travel booking case type, if a passenger indicates that they are traveling with a service animal, they must document the type. size, and age of the animal How do you configure the case life cycle to meet this requirement?

Available Choices (select all choices that are correct

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Gladys
10 hours ago
I disagree, B seems more user-friendly for passengers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
6 days ago
I think option C makes the most sense for identifying the service animal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
11 days ago
This is a tough one, but I'd say B, C, and D are the way to go. Gotta cover all the bases!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
16 days ago
Definitely need that validation rule in D. Can't have any sneaky passengers trying to bring in their "service" hamsters!
upvoted 0 times
...
Joye
21 days ago
Haha, a "Service animal accommodation child case"? What is this, a zoo? I'll go with B and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
26 days ago
B and D seem like the most straightforward options to me. Why overcomplicate things?
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
1 month ago
I definitely recall something about validation rules being useful for ensuring compliance, but I wonder if that alone would cover all the requirements in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
1 month ago
I feel like adding a process to identify the service animal could be effective, but I’m not clear on how to set the conditions for when it should run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
1 month ago
I think applying an optional action could be a good way to gather info without making it mandatory. It feels similar to that practice question we did on optional fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
2 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of documenting service animals in our case studies, but I'm not sure if we should create a separate child case for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
2 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think the best approach would be to combine options B and C - apply an optional action to collect the service animal info, and then have a dedicated process to handle that data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
2 months ago
I like the idea of the child case in option A. That could help keep the main Travel booking case clean and focused, while handling the service animal details separately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
2 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Gotta have that service animal process in there!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
2 months ago
Option D, the validation rule, could be a good way to check if the passenger is traveling with a service animal. That might be a simpler approach than a whole new process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
2 months ago
This question is tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
3 months ago
D is good for validation checks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between options B and C. Both seem to involve adding some kind of process to handle the service animal information. I'll need to read through those choices more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
3 months ago
I think I'd start by looking at option C - adding an "Identify service animal" process within the Travel booking case life cycle. That seems like the most direct way to handle the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Ines
3 months ago
I agree, option C sounds effective. It directly addresses the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel