An accident claim case creates a vehicle claim case for each vehicle involved in an accident. Which two configurations prevent the accident claim case from resolving before all vehicle claims are resolved? (Choose Two)
Hmm, I'm not sure why anyone would want to pause the accident claim until the vehicle claims are paid. That sounds like a recipe for frustration and delays.
B and C are just unnecessary steps that will slow down the process. The goal should be to automate and streamline the workflow, not add extra manual approvals or pauses.
A and D seem like the right choices here. Adding the vehicle claims as child cases and waiting for them to resolve before the accident claim can be resolved makes sense.
Alpha
4 days agoCasie
5 days agoArthur
6 days agoTatum
7 days agoBok
9 days agoCasie
13 days ago