An accident claim case creates a vehicle claim case for each vehicle involved in an accident. Which two configurations prevent the accident claim case from resolving before all vehicle claims are resolved? (Choose Two)
D all the way, but let's hope the system doesn't get stuck in an infinite loop, waiting for those pesky vehicle claims to resolve. Someone should program in a 'forget it, we're done' option.
This is a tricky one, but I think D is the key. Waiting for all vehicle claims to be resolved before the accident claim can be closed is crucial to ensure a complete and accurate resolution.
Hmm, I'm not sure why anyone would want to pause the accident claim until the vehicle claims are paid. That sounds like a recipe for frustration and delays.
B and C are just unnecessary steps that will slow down the process. The goal should be to automate and streamline the workflow, not add extra manual approvals or pauses.
A and D seem like the right choices here. Adding the vehicle claims as child cases and waiting for them to resolve before the accident claim can be resolved makes sense.
Raina
23 days agoVicki
7 days agoLauna
1 months agoValentin
15 days agoMarge
22 days agoKristeen
27 days agoTheron
1 months agoAlpha
2 months agoYuki
29 days agoSamira
1 months agoCasie
2 months agoArthur
2 months agoStephane
5 days agoAnnice
11 days agoReid
1 months agoLeontine
2 months agoTatum
2 months agoBok
2 months agoCasie
2 months ago