New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems PEGACPLSA88V1 Exam - Topic 3 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPLSA88V1 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 3
[All PEGACPLSA88V1 Questions]

A company wants to run the same pega application in its eastern US office as well as its india

office. The eastern united states server runs in the eastern united states time zone. The india server runs in the india time zon. The company wants a process to run in both offices at the same time world-wide once a day regardless of the server's location

How do you efficiently meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Tayna
3 months ago
B looks good too, but I think it adds complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
4 months ago
Not sure if D will work well with time zone differences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
4 months ago
Wait, how do you ensure both servers are in sync?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
4 months ago
I agree, keeping it simple with one agent is smart!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathryn
4 months ago
Option C seems the most efficient to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A, but I’m not confident. It seems like it could lead to issues if the local time isn’t checked correctly. I wish I had more clarity on how that would work in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
5 months ago
I think we had a similar question about agents running in different time zones. I feel like option D makes sense because it mentions synchronizing clocks, which is crucial for timing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option B could work since it uses parameters to check the local time zone. It seems flexible, but I'm a bit confused about how it handles the timing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how time zones can affect scheduling in our practice sessions. I think option C might be the best way to handle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think option A is the best approach, using the activity to check the local time zone and time to ensure the process runs at the right time in each location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
5 months ago
Option D seems like a clever solution, synchronizing the server clocks so the agent can just run at the same time regardless of time zone. That could be an efficient way to handle this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
5 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting one. I'm a bit confused about the difference between the two options that involve using two separate agents. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each approach more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about scheduling a process to run at the same time in different time zones. I think I'll go with option C - defining a single advanced agent that can be scheduled to run in the desired time zone for each server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Finite capacity and job scheduling should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know SharePoint is for collaboration, but the other options also seem like they could be relevant. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B, adding new data sources. Being able to quickly integrate additional data into the model could make it more robust and accurate, which would save time in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I'm pretty sure the answer is A - no, you won't be charged if the DB instance is idle. But I'll review the details just to make sure I'm not missing anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different tools and their impact on the system under test.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a straightforward question about the lifespan of a report. I'll need to think carefully about the options and any relevant information I have about report retention policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
10 months ago
Option E: Throw a dart at the wall and pick whichever answer it lands on. That's probably just as reliable as some of these overcomplicated solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
10 months ago
I'm just going to set my watch to 'Swatch Internet Time' and let the computers figure it out. Blink, blink, blink... It's .beats o'clock somewhere!
upvoted 0 times
Phillip
9 months ago
D) Define a single advanced agent that is scheduled to run in either the eastern united states zone or the india time zone. Ensure that the clocks with the servers in both offices are synchronized using the simple Network time protocal
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
9 months ago
B) Define two advanced agent that call the same parameterzied activity. One agent passes eastern united states time zone to the activity, and the other agent passes india time zone. The activity checks the local time zone. if the parameter matches the local time zone, the activity continues. otherwise it exits
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
9 months ago
A) Define two advanced agents that call the same activity. one agent is scheduled to run at a time in the eastern united states time zone and the other agents is scheduled to run at a time in the india time zone. The activity checks both the local time zone and the local time. if the local time is close to the expected time the activity should run it continues otherwise it exits
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dean
10 months ago
I'd go with option A. It's a bit more complex, but having the agents check the local time zone and time seems like a robust way to ensure the process runs at the same time regardless of server location.
upvoted 0 times
Valda
9 months ago
Definitely, option A provides a solid solution for running the process in both offices at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
9 months ago
I agree, option A seems like the most reliable way to ensure the process runs at the same time worldwide.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
9 months ago
Option A sounds like the best choice. Checking the local time zone and time is crucial for this process to run smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salome
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option D looks interesting, but I'm not convinced that synchronizing the clocks is the most reliable way to ensure the process runs at the same time worldwide.
upvoted 0 times
Apolonia
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option D looks interesting, but I'm not convinced that synchronizing the clocks is the most reliable way to ensure the process runs at the same time worldwide.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
10 months ago
C) Define a single adavanced agent that is scheduled to run in any desired time zone. in the Eastern us server modify the agaent schedule to run in the eastern united states time zone. For the india server, specify the india time zone within the agent schedule
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
10 months ago
B) Define two advanced agent that call the same parameterzied activity. One agent passes eastern united states time zone to the activity, and the other agent passes india time zone. The activity checks the local time zone. if the parameter matches the local time zone, the activity continues. otherwise it exits
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
10 months ago
A) Define two advanced agents that call the same activity. one agent is scheduled to run at a time in the eastern united states time zone and the other agents is scheduled to run at a time in the india time zone. The activity checks both the local time zone and the local time. if the local time is close to the expected time the activity should run it continues otherwise it exits
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edison
11 months ago
Option C seems to be the most efficient solution. Defining a single advanced agent and modifying the schedule for each server to run in the appropriate time zone is a straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Annelle
10 months ago
I agree, it's simple and efficient to just modify the agent schedule for each server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
10 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice. One agent for both servers with different time zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corrie
11 months ago
I'm not sure about option A. I think option C could also work by scheduling the agent to run in any desired time zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is option B. By defining two advanced agents and passing the respective time zones, the activity can check the local time zone and continue executing if it matches the parameter passed.
upvoted 0 times
Cristy
9 months ago
Interesting, I see the benefits of both options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
9 months ago
I would go with option A instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
9 months ago
That sounds like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
10 months ago
I think the correct answer is option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alton
11 months ago
I agree with Marshall. Option A seems to efficiently meet the requirement by considering both time zones and local times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
11 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. It allows the activity to run at the same time worldwide regardless of the server's location.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel