Pegasystems PEGACPLSA88V1 Exam - Topic 2 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPLSA88V1 exam

Question #: 5
Topic #: 2

In the first step in a case type, the user compares data on a form to the data on a customer account. If the data matches, the case is resolved. If the data does not match, the user advances the case to update the account.

Management only wants a record of the cases that update an account. What two configuration options do you use to implement this requirement? (Choose two.)

AAdd a Persist Case shape after the first step.

BApply a when condition to the first step to persist only cases requiring updates.

CConfigure the starting flow to instantiate the case type as a temporary case.

DConfigure the first step to instantiate the case type as a temporary case.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, D

by Hubert at Mar 06, 2024, 12:07 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGACPLSA88V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Desmond

3 months ago

I’m leaning towards B and D, but not sure about D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

3 months ago

A is definitely not needed here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tashia

3 months ago

Wait, can you really use a temporary case for this? Seems odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamar

4 months ago

Totally agree with B! Makes sense to filter out the rest.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chery

4 months ago

I think B and C are the right choices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Suzi

4 months ago

I feel like configuring the starting flow as a temporary case might be a good option, but I’m not clear on how that fits with the need for records.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherilyn

4 months ago

I’m leaning towards adding a Persist Case shape after the first step, but I’m not confident about whether that alone meets the requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ariel

4 months ago

I remember a practice question where we had to decide between persisting cases or using temporary cases. It feels similar to this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Genevieve

5 months ago

I think we need to apply a when condition to only keep cases that require updates, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Peter

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards option A. Adding a Persist Case shape after the first step seems like it would work, but I'll need to double-check the requirements to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yvonne

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused on the difference between a temporary case and a persistent case. I'll need to review that before deciding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eden

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the key is to only persist the cases that require an account update, so I'd go with option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawn

5 months ago

Okay, I've got it. We need to only keep a record of the cases that update the account, so option B is the way to go. Persist the case only when the data doesn't match.

upvoted 0 times

...

Flo

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. I'm pretty sure the answer has to involve using some kind of approval process or flow, since that's what the question is asking about. I'll review the options carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mireya

5 months ago

I'm pretty sure the answer is D. Small local governments have some flexibility in how they approach financial reporting, so they could choose a compilation, review, member's audit, or agreed-upon procedures, depending on their needs and state requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shalon

5 months ago

This question seems similar to a practice problem we had about currency fluctuations affecting stock options. Maybe that's why a share exchange is more appealing?

upvoted 0 times

...