Pegasystems PEGACPLSA23V1 Exam - Topic 6 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPLSA23V1 exam

Question #: 3
Topic #: 6

[Application Design]

XYZ Corp wants to streamline its business processes across various divisions and units. The goal is to develop a Pega application structure that efficiently uses resourceswhile promoting a modular reuse architecture. Given this scenario, which of the following options is the correct approach?

ACreate an enterprise application with a framework application structure, and then create the required division and unit applications as implementation application structures.

BCreate an enterprise application with an implementation application structure. Then, create the required division and unit applications as implementation application structures.

CCreate an enterprise application with both framework and implementation application structures, and then create the required division and unit applications as implementation application structures on top of the framework structure.

DCreate separate implementation application structures for each division and unit. Each application communicates with another by using DX APIs.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Amber at Jun 10, 2025, 03:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGACPLSA23V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Mel

4 months ago

C is interesting, but isn't it overcomplicating things?

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherelle

4 months ago

I disagree, B could work too, but it lacks flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mammie

4 months ago

Option A seems like the best choice for modularity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malinda

4 months ago

Wait, can we really mix framework and implementation like that?

upvoted 0 times

...

Raul

4 months ago

D sounds risky, relying on DX APIs could lead to issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardo

5 months ago

I feel like option D is too isolated; having separate structures for each division seems inefficient. I think we need a more integrated approach like in option C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused about the difference between implementation and framework structures. I feel like option B might be too limiting, but I can't recall the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisbeth

5 months ago

I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think creating a framework structure is crucial for promoting reuse, which makes me lean towards option C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Miriam

5 months ago

I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if a framework application is the right choice for modular reuse.

upvoted 0 times

...

Florinda

5 months ago

Option C looks like the most comprehensive solution that addresses the requirements. I'll go with that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

6 months ago

The question mentions a "modular reuse architecture," so I'm thinking option C is the way to go. That approach seems to align best with the goal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reynalda

6 months ago

I'm leaning towards option C - creating a framework application structure seems like the best way to enable reuse across the divisions and units.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittney

6 months ago

Hmm, the options seem similar, but I think the key is to identify the approach that best promotes modular reuse and efficient resource usage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnathon

6 months ago

This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key requirements before selecting an answer.

upvoted 0 times

...