Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems Exam PEGACPDC88V1 Topic 5 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPDC88V1 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 5
[All PEGACPDC88V1 Questions]

A bank has been running traditional marketing campaigns for many years. One such campaign sends an offer email to qualified customers on day one. On day five, the bank presents a similar offer if the first email is ignored.

If you re-implement this requirement by using the always-on outbound customer engagement paradigm, how do you approach this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Blair
18 days ago
Option A - two segments and two schedules? That's overkill, man. Just get the AI to do its thing and let it figure out the optimal timing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
20 days ago
I'm torn between B and C. B is simpler, but C sounds more sophisticated. Maybe I'll just flip a coin and hope for the best!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
22 days ago
Option D sounds like it could work, but I'm not sure about the ad-hoc schedule. Wouldn't it be better to have a more consistent approach?
upvoted 0 times
Estrella
2 days ago
A: Option B might be a better choice. It allows for a more automated and structured approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marylin
2 months ago
I'd go with Option C. Let the AI handle the scheduling and engagement policies - it'll probably do a better job than manually setting up multiple schedules.
upvoted 0 times
Kimbery
12 days ago
I agree, AI can definitely optimize the process better than manual scheduling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
1 months ago
Option C sounds like the best choice. Letting the AI handle it seems more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Oliva
2 months ago
I personally prefer option C as it utilizes AI to choose the best action based on engagement policies, ensuring optimal results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more efficient as it automates the process with appropriate wait times between emails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
2 months ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward approach. Separating the emails into a flow makes it easy to manage the timing and content of each one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
2 months ago
I think option A is the best approach because it allows for targeting specific audiences with each email.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel