Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pegasystems PEGACPDC88V1 Exam - Topic 10 Question 23 Discussion

Which of the following reasons explains why a customer might receive an action that they already accepted?
C) The suppression rules are not defined to exclude previously accepted actions.
A) The action suitability conditions are not defined.
B) The volume constraint is not set to exclude previously accepted offers.
D) The actions are filtered based on eligibility.

Pegasystems PEGACPDC88V1 Exam - Topic 10 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPDC88V1 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 10
[All PEGACPDC88V1 Questions]

Which of the following reasons explains why a customer might receive an action that they already accepted?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Pega Customer Decision Hub is a dynamic and adaptive system that constantly reevaluates the Next-Best-Action for each customer based on their interactions and feedback. If a customer rejects an offer, the system will update the customer profile and the offer performance, and then reapply the Next-Best-Action strategy to select and prioritize another offer that is more relevant and valuable for the customer. Verified Reference: [Pega Decisioning Consultant | Pega Academy]


by Staci at Jun 23, 2024, 12:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGACPDC88V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Salena
7 months ago
I didn't realize this could happen, kinda surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
8 months ago
B makes sense too, volume constraints can be tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
8 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? What if it's A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
8 months ago
Agree, suppression rules are key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
8 months ago
I think it's definitely option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
9 months ago
I feel like eligibility filtering could be a factor, but I need to think more about option D. It’s a bit unclear to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards A, but I can't recall the specifics about action suitability conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
9 months ago
I remember discussing volume constraints, so maybe option B is the right answer? It sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
9 months ago
I think it might be option C about suppression rules, but I'm not entirely sure. We did cover something similar in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
9 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. The obvious answer is option C - the suppression rules are not defined to exclude previously accepted actions. That's the most logical explanation for why a customer would receive an action they've already accepted. I'm confident this is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key here is that the system should be set up to prevent customers from receiving actions they've already accepted. So the correct answer is likely related to the suppression rules or volume constraints not being properly configured to exclude those previously accepted actions. I'll double-check the options to confirm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
9 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the differences between the options here. I'll need to make sure I understand the key concepts around action suitability, volume constraints, and suppression rules before I can confidently select the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
9 months ago
This question seems to be testing our understanding of the conditions and rules that govern the actions offered to customers. I'll need to carefully review the options and think about how the different factors like suitability, volume constraints, and suppression rules could lead to a customer receiving an action they've already accepted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
10 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The table is for HR profiles, so it's likely tracking different types of employees. I'll need to identify the three options that represent employment types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
10 months ago
This looks like a straightforward Citrix Web App Firewall configuration issue. I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question already accepted it multiple times!
upvoted 0 times
Alayna
1 year ago
C) The suppression rules are not defined to exclude previously accepted actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
1 year ago
B) The volume constraint is not set to exclude previously accepted offers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
1 year ago
A) The action suitability conditions are not defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Layla
1 year ago
I'm going with A. The suitability conditions are not defined, so the system might offer something the customer already accepted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
1 year ago
B makes the most sense to me. The volume constraint should be set to exclude previously accepted offers.
upvoted 0 times
Nickolas
1 year ago
Yes, the volume constraint should definitely be set to exclude previously accepted offers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
1 year ago
I agree, B seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alex
1 year ago
D seems like the right choice. The actions are filtered based on eligibility, which could lead to receiving an action they've already accepted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
1 year ago
I think option C is the correct answer. The suppression rules should be defined to exclude previously accepted actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
1 year ago
But if the suppression rules are not defined, then the customer might receive an action they already accepted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chara
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
1 year ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel