Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pegasystems PEGACPBA24V1 Exam - Topic 2 Question 11 Discussion

When applicants apply for a job, their application is reviewed by an HR member who determines whether the applicant's qualifications are appropriate. If qualified, they proceed to schedule a phone interview. If unqualified, the application is rejected. How do you configure an Approve/Reject Step to satisfy this requirement?
A) Route to HR member, if approved then schedule interview, if rejected then resolve case.
B) Route to applicant, if approved then schedule interview, if rejected then notify applicant.
C) Route to HR manager, if approved then notify applicant, if rejected then schedule interview.
D) Route to HR member, if approved then resolve case, if rejected then schedule interview.

Pegasystems PEGACPBA24V1 Exam - Topic 2 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPBA24V1 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 2
[All PEGACPBA24V1 Questions]

When applicants apply for a job, their application is reviewed by an HR member who determines whether the applicant's qualifications are appropriate. If qualified, they proceed to schedule a phone interview. If unqualified, the application is rejected. How do you configure an Approve/Reject Step to satisfy this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

This question tests Approve/Reject configuration.

A: Correct. Routing to HR, approving to schedule, rejecting to resolve aligns with the requirement. Extract: Pega Academy, Process Design -- Approvals: ''Approve/Reject steps route to users, with approved/rejected paths configured.''

B: Incorrect. Routing to the applicant is illogical. Extract: Pega Academy, Process Design: ''Routing targets reviewers, not applicants.''

C: Incorrect. Approval shouldn't notify; rejection shouldn't schedule. Extract: Pega Academy, Process Design -- Approvals: ''Approval paths advance; rejection paths resolve or notify.''

D: Incorrect. Approval shouldn't resolve; rejection shouldn't schedule. Extract: Pega Academy, Process Design -- Approvals: ''Approval advances; rejection typically resolves.''


by Nieves at Mar 04, 2026, 07:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGACPBA24V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Martha
5 days ago
I agree, A is clear. Interview scheduling is next.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
10 days ago
I think option A makes the most sense. HR should decide first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
15 days ago
I like option D. Resolving the case after approval is unnecessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
20 days ago
Option C seems off. Why notify if approved? Just schedule the interview.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
25 days ago
I prefer option B. The applicant should be notified directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
1 month ago
I think option A is the best. HR should decide first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
1 month ago
Option D is confusing. Resolving the case before scheduling? Doesn't add up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
1 month ago
Option C seems off. Why notify if approved? Just schedule the interview.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
2 months ago
I prefer option B. Notifying the applicant is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
2 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense. HR should decide first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
2 months ago
I can't believe this is even a question, it’s so straightforward!
upvoted 0 times
...
Adria
2 months ago
C) is totally off, it should be HR member, not manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
4 months ago
Wait, why would you schedule an interview for a rejected applicant?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
4 months ago
I disagree, B) makes more sense for communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
4 months ago
A) seems like the best choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
4 months ago
C sounds weird, why notify before scheduling?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
4 months ago
B is off, you need HR to approve first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
4 months ago
Wait, why would you schedule an interview for a rejected applicant?
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
5 months ago
Totally agree with A! Makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
5 months ago
A seems right, HR should decide first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
5 months ago
I thought option C was the best choice at first, but now I’m questioning if notifying the applicant after approval is the right step. I need to double-check the process we studied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D, but I’m confused about why we would schedule an interview if the application is rejected. That doesn’t seem right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
5 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to decide who to route to. I feel like option B makes sense since it involves notifying the applicant, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
5 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar because it mentions routing to the HR member, which is what we practiced in class. But I'm not sure about the "resolve case" part.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel