Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam - Topic 5 Question 68 Discussion

Posted by Jettie on May 07, 2026 at 04:39 PM

Scenario 9: OpenTech provides IT and communications services. It helps data communication enterprises and network operators become multi-service providers During an internal audit, its internal auditor, Tim, has identified nonconformities related to the monitoring procedures He identified and evaluated several system Invulnerabilities.

Tim found out that user IDs for systems and services that process sensitive information have been reused and the access control policy has not been followed After analyzing the root causes of this nonconformity, the ISMS project manager developed a list of possible actions to resolve the nonconformity. Then, the ISMS project manager analyzed the list and selected the activities that would allow the elimination of the root cause and the prevention of a similar situation in the future. These activities were included in an action plan The action plan, approved by the top management, was written as follows:

A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department

The approved action plan was implemented and all actions described in the plan were documented.

Based on scenario 9. did the ISMS project manager complete the corrective action process appropriately?

Suggested Answer: C

According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, the corrective action process consists of the following steps12:

Reacting to the nonconformity and, as applicable, taking action to control and correct it and deal with the consequences

Evaluating the need for action to eliminate the root cause(s) of the nonconformity, in order that it does not recur or occur elsewhere

Implementing the action needed

Reviewing the effectiveness of the corrective action taken

Making changes to the information security management system, if necessary

In scenario 9, the ISMS project manager did not complete the last step of reviewing the effectiveness of the corrective action taken. This step is important to verify that the corrective action has achieved the intended results and that no adverse effects have been introduced.The review can be done by using various methods, such as audits, tests, inspections, or performance indicators3. Therefore, the ISMS project manager did not complete the corrective action process appropriately.

1:ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 10.22:Procedure for Corrective Action [ISO 27001 templates]3:ISO 27001 Clause 10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action


Get Premium ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
24 comments · newest first
MO
Moira 2 days ago
Exactly, C highlights the need for follow-up.
AL
Alberto 7 days ago
But without a review, how can they ensure effectiveness?
TA
Tayna 12 days ago
A is solid. They documented everything, that's crucial.
CE
Celestina 17 days ago
B seems right. Just changing the policy isn't enough.
WI
Wilda 23 days ago
I lean towards C. They need to review the actions taken.
AL
Altha 28 days ago
I agree, but I feel like they missed some steps.
SH
Shawnee 1 month ago
I think the answer is A. They identified the issue and took action.
MU
Muriel 1 month ago
C highlights a gap. Review is key for future compliance.
DI
Dierdre 1 month ago
A seems solid. They did a thorough analysis.
SA
Sanjuana 2 months ago
I feel like B could be valid too. Did they really fix the root cause?
LU
Luis 2 months ago
I lean towards A. They documented everything well.
NE
Nenita 2 months ago
True, C is important. Implementation review is crucial.
FR
Francine 2 months ago
But what about C? They need to review the actions too.
SH
Sharika 2 months ago
I agree, A makes sense. They followed the steps needed.
MA
Marla 2 months ago
I think the answer is A. They identified the issue and took action.
NA
Nathalie 3 months ago
I’m not sure if just updating the policy is enough.
DE
Delbert 3 months ago
Totally agree, they need to check if the actions worked after.
BE
Beth 3 months ago
Wait, they reused user IDs? That's a huge red flag!
WI
Wilda 3 months ago
I think they missed reviewing the implementation part.
CL
Clarence 3 months ago
Sounds like they followed the steps right.
ED
Edison 4 months ago
I thought the corrective action process should include follow-up reviews to ensure everything is working as intended. That seems like a gap in this scenario.
CA
Cassi 5 months ago
I feel like just having a new access control policy isn't enough. The root cause needs to be tackled more directly, right?
JU
Jules 5 months ago
I remember a practice question that emphasized the importance of reviewing the implementation of corrective actions. That might be a missing step here.
JO
Joye 5 months ago
I think the ISMS project manager did a good job identifying the nonconformity and creating an action plan, but I'm not sure if they fully addressed the root cause.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel