New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam - Topic 5 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 5
[All ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Questions]

What is an example of a good physical security measure?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Marge at Jan 24, 2024, 11:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Marti
3 months ago
I’m not sure about C, what if maintenance causes more issues?
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
3 months ago
Wait, are we really just throwing away old printers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
3 months ago
Access passes help track who’s in and out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
4 months ago
I disagree, C is more important for quick response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
4 months ago
A is definitely a good measure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
4 months ago
I vaguely recall something about removing old equipment being a security risk, so option B doesn't seem right to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
4 months ago
Option C seems risky to me; I mean, quick access for maintenance could lead to unauthorized entry, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about access control measures, and I feel like carrying access passes is definitely important for physical security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
5 months ago
I think option A sounds like a solid security measure, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonie
5 months ago
I think option A is the best answer here. Requiring access passes for everyone is a common and effective physical security practice. The other options don't seem as directly relevant to the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
5 months ago
Option C about giving maintenance staff quick access to the server area doesn't seem right. That could compromise security. I'm leaning towards A or B, but I'll double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
5 months ago
Access passes for employees and visitors? That sounds like a solid physical security measure to me. I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about physical security measures. I'll think through the options carefully and choose the one that best fits the description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to re-read the question and options closely to make sure I understand what they're looking for in a good physical security measure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
5 months ago
I think this is asking about the type of subscription plan we need to create. The options seem to be related to pricing and time, so I'll need to carefully consider the details of the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused. I thought that Service Autonomy was important for resource management, but I don't see how it fits here…
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the ralus.cfg file, so I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to read through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
5 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. The question is asking about the combined availability, and I think I can use the formula provided in one of the answer choices to calculate that. I just need to make sure I'm applying it correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel