MENU
Who should verily the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee after an internal audit?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
KE
Kent
10 months ago
Definitely agree with option A, makes the most sense!
RE
Reuben
11 months ago
Wait, why would we trust the internal auditor to verify their own work?
JO
Joye
11 months ago
The info security manager might be too close to the issues.
WA
Wayne
11 months ago
I think the internal auditor should do it; they know the context best.
AD
Adolph
11 months ago
An independent auditor brings objectivity to the evaluation.
FL
Fletcher
12 months ago
I believe the internal auditor is responsible for follow-up, but I also recall discussions about the importance of having an independent review.
SH
Sharmaine
12 months ago
I’m torn between the internal auditor and the information security manager. I feel like both have roles in this process, but which one is more appropriate?
EN
Enola
12 months ago
I remember a practice question where it mentioned that an independent auditor could provide an unbiased perspective, so maybe option A is correct?
JO
Joaquin
1 year ago
I think the internal auditor should verify the effectiveness since they are familiar with the audit findings, but I'm not entirely sure.
ZA
Zana
1 year ago
I'm confident that the internal auditor is the one who should verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions. They have the necessary expertise and understanding of the organization to make that assessment.
TH
Thora
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The internal auditor is responsible for the initial audit, but an independent auditor should be brought in to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee. That's the best way to ensure an objective assessment.
EM
Emogene
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know internal audits are important, but I'm not sure who is responsible for verifying the effectiveness of the corrective actions. I'll have to think this through carefully.
TE
Terry
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about internal audits. I think the key is to understand the roles and responsibilities of the different parties involved.
WE
Wenona
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The metadata server needs to be in a specific state for this to work. I'm pretty sure it's not "Online" or "Administration", so I'll have to choose between "Running" and "Stopped".
MA
Maryanne
2 years ago
The internal auditor is the way to go. They're like the audit version of Sherlock Holmes - they'll get to the botMaryanne of things.
RE
Rex
2 years ago
A) An Independent auditor should be contracted to perform this evaluation
NO
Noelia
2 years ago
The internal auditor knows the ins and outs of the audit process
FI
Fidelia
2 years ago
B) The internal auditor
CA
Candra
2 years ago
A) An Independent auditor should be contracted to perform this evaluation
AL
Alline
2 years ago
The internal auditor should verify the corrective actions. It's like asking the fox to guard the henhouse if you let the information security manager do it.
GI
Gianna
2 years ago
The information security manager? Really? They're not even involved in the internal audit process. The internal auditor is the clear choice here.
CL
Clorinda
2 years ago
The information security manager is not involved in the internal audit process.
TA
Talia
2 years ago
An independent auditor should be contracted to perform this evaluation.
BE
Bethanie
2 years ago
The internal auditor is the one who should verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions.
SH
Sheldon
2 years ago
I think an independent auditor should be brought in to provide an unbiased evaluation. The internal auditor might be too close to the situation.
LI
Linette
2 years ago
A) Exactly, it's important to have an unbiased perspective when assessing corrective actions
GL
Gladis
2 years ago
C) The information security manager may not have the necessary expertise for this evaluation
GL
Glenn
2 years ago
B) I agree, an independent auditor would provide a more objective assessment
AD
Adolph
2 years ago
A) An Independent auditor should be contracted to perform this evaluation
CA
Catalina
2 years ago
Definitely the internal auditor. They're already familiar with the issues and can ensure the corrective actions were properly implemented.
CY
Cyndy
2 years ago
An independent auditor could also provide an unbiased perspective on the effectiveness of the corrective actions.
TO
Tom
2 years ago
I agree, they have the knowledge and expertise to ensure everything was done correctly.
DO
Dorothy
2 years ago
The internal auditor should definitely verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions.
DI
Dion
2 years ago
I believe the internal auditor should be responsible. They are familiar with the company's processes.
LY
Lyla
2 years ago
The internal auditor should verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions. They have the best understanding of the audit findings and recommendations.
SH
Shantay
2 years ago
The internal auditor should verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions. They have the best understanding of the audit findings and recommendations.
AD
Adelle
2 years ago
B) The internal auditor
JA
Jaime
2 years ago
A) An Independent auditor should be contracted to perform this evaluation
SH
Shawana
2 years ago
I agree with Mose. They would provide an unbiased evaluation.
MO
Mose
2 years ago
I think an independent auditor should be contracted.