Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PECB ISO-14001-Lead-Auditor Exam - Topic 3 Question 7 Discussion

During a Stage 1 audit, the EMS Manager asks that the audit includes coverage of a new storage site on the other side of town that they have taken over since the application was made.Which two of the following actions should the auditor take?
C) Determine whether the EMS Management System covers the new site and, if so, proceed with the audit. and F) Advise the EMS Manager that an extension of the scope is possible but will have to go through established procedures.
A) Advise the EMS Manager that, within the existing scope, the new site can be included without any problem.
B) Advise the EMS Manager that the audit scope has been set and the audit will need to proceed as planned.
D) Suggest that the EMS Manager cancels the audit contract and reapplies for the new situation.
E) Inform the auditee that the Stage 2 will be changed to include the new site.

PECB ISO-14001-Lead-Auditor Exam - Topic 3 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-14001-Lead-Auditor exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 3
[All ISO-14001-Lead-Auditor Questions]

During a Stage 1 audit, the EMS Manager asks that the audit includes coverage of a new storage site on the other side of town that they have taken over since the application was made.

Which two of the following actions should the auditor take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, F

by Junita at Jul 08, 2025, 04:04 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISO-14001-Lead-Auditor Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Marta
7 months ago
I don't think they should cancel the audit. That seems extreme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
7 months ago
Option F is the way to go. Procedures are there for a reason!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
7 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense. Check if the new site is covered first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
7 months ago
Totally agree with C! No point in rushing into it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
7 months ago
Wait, can they really just add a new site like that? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
8 months ago
I vaguely recall that if a new site is added, it might complicate things. Suggesting a cancellation and reapplication seems extreme, so I doubt option D is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
8 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to consider changes in scope. I feel like option F makes sense since it mentions established procedures for scope changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the audit scope is pretty rigid once it's set. Maybe option B is the safest route?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
8 months ago
I remember discussing how important it is to verify if the EMS Management System covers new sites before proceeding with audits. So, I think option C might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
9 months ago
Okay, I've got a plan. I'll start by assessing whether the new site is already within the scope of the EMS Management System. If so, I can include it without issue. If not, I'll advise the EMS Manager on the proper procedure for a scope extension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I think I'll need to consult the audit guidelines and discuss with the EMS Manager to understand the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
9 months ago
I've got this! The key is to determine if the new site is already covered under the existing EMS Management System. If so, I can just proceed with the audit as planned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused here. I'll need to think through the implications of each option and make sure I understand the proper procedures for handling a scope change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
9 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and consider whether the new site is already covered under the existing scope or if a scope extension is required.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel