Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PCI CPSA Exam - Topic 5 Question 40 Discussion

A CPSA Company has submitted multiple reports that are incomplete and do not contain the information described in the reporting instructions. Which of the following are possible outcomes?
A) They may be put into remediation or revoked by the applicable payment brands
B) They may be put into remediation or revoked by PCI SSC
C) They may be fined by the applicable payment brands
D) They may be fined by PCI SSC

PCI CPSA Exam - Topic 5 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for PCI's CPSA exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 5
[All CPSA Questions]

A CPSA Company has submitted multiple reports that are incomplete and do not contain the information described in the reporting instructions. Which of the following are possible outcomes?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Jesusita at Nov 18, 2024, 11:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPSA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Barabara
10 months ago
Totally agree, fines are a common outcome here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
10 months ago
Wait, can they really be revoked? That sounds extreme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
10 months ago
Remediation seems likely too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
10 months ago
I think PCI SSC can also impose fines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
10 months ago
They can definitely be fined by the payment brands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
11 months ago
I recall a practice question where remediation was mentioned, so I’m leaning towards A, but I could be mixing it up with something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
11 months ago
I feel like fines are definitely a possibility, so option C might be right, but I’m not sure about D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
11 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about PCI SSC having authority too, so maybe option B could be correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Catrice
11 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, like we discussed how payment brands can take action if reports are incomplete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is remembering that the payment brands (like Visa, Mastercard, etc.) are the ones who can put a CPSA company into remediation or revoke their status. The PCI SSC is the organization that oversees the PCI DSS standard, but they don't directly impose those kinds of penalties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
11 months ago
Thanks, MikeT. That helps clarify things. I think I've got a good handle on the possible outcomes now and I'm ready to select the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the consequences of submitting incomplete PCI DSS reports. I'll carefully review the options and choose the one that best matches the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
2 years ago
I'm going to go with B and D. The PCI SSC and the payment brands both have the power to hand out the punishments, and I have a feeling this company is about to get schooled in the world of compliance.
upvoted 0 times
Nathan
2 years ago
User 4: They might end up in remediation or facing fines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
2 years ago
User 3: The company better get their act together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
2 years ago
User 2: Yeah, the PCI SSC and payment brands can both hand out punishments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 years ago
User 1: I think B and D are possible outcomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laquanda
2 years ago
But what if they are put into remediation or revoked by PCI SSC instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalyn
2 years ago
I agree with Alysa. It's important to follow the reporting instructions to avoid fines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
2 years ago
I think if the reports are incomplete, they may be fined by the payment brands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
2 years ago
As someone who has had to fill out these reports, I feel for the poor soul at that CPSA company. They're probably wishing they had just used Mad Libs instead of the actual reporting instructions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
2 years ago
Hmm, I think all of the options are possible. This company is in big trouble! They better get their act together before the payment brands come knocking at their door.
upvoted 0 times
Aliza
2 years ago
Buddy: They better fix this before it's too late.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
2 years ago
User 3: They might also face fines from both the payment brands and PCI SSC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
2 years ago
User 2: Yeah, they could end up in remediation or even get revoked by the payment brands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
2 years ago
User 1: The company really messed up with those incomplete reports.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janine
2 years ago
I'd go with B and C. The PCI SSC has the authority to put companies into remediation or revocation, and the payment brands can also fine them for non-compliance.
upvoted 0 times
Valentine
2 years ago
Non-compliance with reporting requirements can have serious consequences for companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
2 years ago
It's important for companies to follow reporting instructions to avoid being fined or put into remediation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
2 years ago
I agree, B and C are the most likely outcomes for incomplete reports.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mammie
2 years ago
A, C, and D seem like reasonable outcomes for incomplete and missing information in the reports. PCI and the payment brands can definitely take action against the company for not following the reporting instructions.
upvoted 0 times
Vincent
2 years ago
D) They may be fined by PCI SSC
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
2 years ago
C) They may be fined by the applicable payment brands
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
2 years ago
A) They may be put into remediation or revoked by the applicable payment brands
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel