Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks XSIAM-Engineer Exam - Topic 4 Question 15 Discussion

Posted by Hubert on Jun 17, 2026 at 06:57 PM

A Behavioral Threat Protection (BTP) alert is triggered with an action of "Prevented (Blocked)" on one of several application servers running Windows Server 2022. The investigation determines the involved processes to be legitimate core OS binaries, and the description from the triggered BTP rule is an acceptable risk for the company to allow the same activity in the future.

This type of activity is only expected on the endpoints that are members of the endpoint group "AppServers," which already has a separate prevention policy rule with an exceptions profile named "Exceptions-AppServers" and a malware profile named "Malware-AppServers."

The CGO that was terminated has the following properties:

SHA256: eb71ea69dd19f728ab9240565e8c7efb59821e19e3788e289301e1e74940c208

File path: C:\Windows\System32\cmd.exe

Digital Signer: Microsoft Corporation

How should the exception be created so that it is scoped as narrowly as possible to minimize the security gap?

Suggested Answer: B

The most secure approach is to create a Disable Prevention Rule via Exceptions Configuration, scoped specifically to the Exceptions-AppServers profile. This rule should include the hash (SHA256), signer (Microsoft Corporation), and file path (C:WindowsSystem32cmd.exe). This ensures the exception is applied only to the trusted, legitimate process on the AppServers group while minimizing the security gap.


Get Premium XSIAM-Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
NA
Natalya 2 months ago
Option D seems too broad. Global scope could expose us to threats.
AN
Antonio 2 months ago
I agree, A minimizes the risk. We need to be careful with exceptions.
FI
Filiberto 2 months ago
I think option A is the best. It’s specific to the AppServers.
IV
Ivette 2 months ago
A is solid, especially since it's a legit Microsoft file.
DO
Doyle 2 months ago
I think we should stick with the default settings, just to be safe.
DE
Delmy 3 months ago
Wait, are we really trusting cmd.exe? That feels risky.
PR
Princess 3 months ago
I disagree, B could work too if we need broader coverage.
SK
Skye 3 months ago
Option A seems like the best choice for narrow scoping.
TE
Tesha 3 months ago
I vaguely recall something about the Legacy Agent Exception, but I can't remember if it was the best practice for this scenario.
EL
Elly 3 months ago
I think option D might be too broad since it applies to "Global." We want to limit the exception to just the AppServers, right?
ST
Stephaine 3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like we practiced a similar question where we had to choose between creating exceptions directly from alerts or through configuration settings.
ST
Stefany 4 months ago
I remember we discussed how important it is to scope exceptions narrowly to avoid security risks, so I think option A makes sense.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel