Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks XSIAM-Engineer Exam - Topic 1 Question 18 Discussion

A Cortex XSIAM engineer adds a disable injection and prevention rule for a specific running process. After an hour, the engineer disables the rule to reinstate the security capabilities, but the capabilities are not applied.What is the explanation for this behavior?
A) The engineer needs to restart the process to get back the security capabilities.
B) The engineer needs a support exception to get back the security capabilities.
C) The engineer needs to wait for the time period configured in the rule to pass first.
D) The engineer can disable the rule, but security capabilities are not applied to the process.

Palo Alto Networks XSIAM-Engineer Exam - Topic 1 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's XSIAM-Engineer exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 1
[All XSIAM-Engineer Questions]

A Cortex XSIAM engineer adds a disable injection and prevention rule for a specific running process. After an hour, the engineer disables the rule to reinstate the security capabilities, but the capabilities are not applied.

What is the explanation for this behavior?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

When a disable injection and prevention rule is applied to a running process, the security capabilities are detached for the lifetime of that process. Even after disabling the rule, the capabilities are not reapplied automatically; the process must be restarted to restore security enforcement.


by Ivette at Aug 16, 2026, 09:07 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium XSIAM-Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Zita
3 days ago
Could be C, but I doubt the time period is the issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
8 days ago
Definitely not B, support exceptions shouldn't be needed for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
13 days ago
Wait, are you serious? I thought disabling would automatically reinstate them!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
19 days ago
I think it's option D, disabling doesn't apply them back.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
24 days ago
Sounds like a restart is needed to restore security.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
29 days ago
I’m a bit confused about the timing aspect. Was there something about waiting for a configured time period before changes take effect?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
1 month ago
I feel like I read that once a rule is disabled, the security capabilities might not automatically come back. Is that what option D is saying?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
1 month ago
I think there was a practice question about disabling rules, and it mentioned that security capabilities might not be reinstated immediately. Could it be related to that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
1 month ago
I remember something about needing to restart the process to reapply security settings, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only step needed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel