Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks XSIAM-Analyst Exam - Topic 4 Question 15 Discussion

SCENARIO:A security analyst has been assigned a ticket from the help desk stating that users are experiencing errors when attempting to open files on a specific network share. These errors state that the file format cannot be opened. IT has verified that the file server is online and functioning, but that all files have unusual extensions attached to them.The security analyst reviews alerts within Cortex XSIAM and identifies malicious activity related to a possible ransomware attack on the file server. This incident is then escalated to the incident response team for further investigation.Upon reviewing the incident, the responders confirm that ransomware was successfully executed on the file server. Other details of the attack are noted below:* An unpatched vulnerability on an externally facing web server was exploited for initial access* The attackers successfully used Mimikatz to dump sensitive credentials that were used for privilege escalation* PowerShell was used on a Windows server for additional discovery, as well as lateral movement to other systems* The attackers executed SystemBC RAT on multiple systems to maintain remote access* Ransomware payload was downloaded on the file server via an external site "file io"QUESTION STATEMENT:Which hunt collection category in Cortex XSIAM should the incident responders use to identify all systems where the attackers established persistence during the attack?
A) Remote Access
B) Network Data
C) Process Execution
D) Command History

Palo Alto Networks XSIAM-Analyst Exam - Topic 4 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's XSIAM-Analyst exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 4
[All XSIAM-Analyst Questions]

SCENARIO:

A security analyst has been assigned a ticket from the help desk stating that users are experiencing errors when attempting to open files on a specific network share. These errors state that the file format cannot be opened. IT has verified that the file server is online and functioning, but that all files have unusual extensions attached to them.

The security analyst reviews alerts within Cortex XSIAM and identifies malicious activity related to a possible ransomware attack on the file server. This incident is then escalated to the incident response team for further investigation.

Upon reviewing the incident, the responders confirm that ransomware was successfully executed on the file server. Other details of the attack are noted below:

* An unpatched vulnerability on an externally facing web server was exploited for initial access

* The attackers successfully used Mimikatz to dump sensitive credentials that were used for privilege escalation

* PowerShell was used on a Windows server for additional discovery, as well as lateral movement to other systems

* The attackers executed SystemBC RAT on multiple systems to maintain remote access

* Ransomware payload was downloaded on the file server via an external site "file io"

QUESTION STATEMENT:

Which hunt collection category in Cortex XSIAM should the incident responders use to identify all systems where the attackers established persistence during the attack?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The correct answer is A -- Remote Access.

The Remote Access hunt collection category in Cortex XSIAM is specifically designed to help incident responders identify endpoints where attackers have installed remote access tools (RATs) or backdoors, which are classic methods of attacker persistence. In this scenario, the attackers executed SystemBC RAT on multiple systems to maintain remote access, making the 'Remote Access' category the most relevant for finding all endpoints where persistence was established.

'Remote Access hunt collections in Cortex XSIAM identify the presence of remote access tools such as RATs and backdoors used by attackers to maintain persistence on endpoints. Analysts should review this collection category after incidents involving tools like SystemBC RAT.'

Document Reference: XSIAM Analyst ILT Lab Guide.pdf, Page 28 (Alerting and Detection / Threat Intel Management sections)


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
German
1 day ago
Surprised they got in through an unpatched web server! That's a rookie mistake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
7 days ago
C) Process Execution could also show what was running during the attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
12 days ago
Wait, are we sure they used Remote Access? Could be other options too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
17 days ago
Totally agree, that makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
22 days ago
Gotta go with A) Remote Access for persistence tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
27 days ago
I’m leaning towards Network Data because it might show the connections made by the RAT, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
1 month ago
This scenario reminds me of a practice question where we had to identify persistence methods. I feel like Process Execution could also be relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
1 month ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about Command History being useful for tracking actions taken by attackers.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
1 month ago
I think the right category might be Remote Access since the attackers used a RAT to maintain access.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel